Sefton Council And One Vision Housing’s Partnership To Tackle Rough Sleeping

Sefton Council and One Vision Housing are launching My Place, a project to tackle the rise in rough sleeping across the Borough, reports MySefton News.

Funded by the Government’s Rough Sleepers Initiative, the project will provide properties for eight rough sleepers in Sefton. They will be supported to independent living through My Place which will provide bespoke person-centred support.

Homelessness is often linked to complex challenges including mental health, physical wellbeing and alcohol and other substance use. My Place takes a holistic approach that ensures residents have everything they need to rebuild their lives. My Place is part of a wider Homeless and Rough Sleeper Strategy aimed to reduce and eventually end rough sleeping in Sefton. It is being introduced in close collaboration with the Sefton Supported Housing Group. As well as protecting Sefton’s most vulnerable residents, through a long-term alternative to rough sleeping, My Place will also influence how homelessness is tackled in the future.

Ian Mitchell, Managing Director (Housing) for One Vision Housing said: “We truly believe that everyone deserves a place to call home and a lack of stable housing can lead to significant personal challenges. By offering a viable, long-term solution, this project aims to protect the borough’s most vulnerable residents and influence how homelessness is tackled in the future. Being approached by Sefton Council to partner on this initiative is testament to our ongoing commitment to providing safe homes and communities where people can thrive.”

Cllr Daren Veidman, Sefton Council’s Cabinet member with responsibility for housing said: “We know that people’s lives are completely changed by having a secure and stable home. It is a fundamental need and this “My Place” project with One Vision Housing will help provide that through these new properties for rough sleepers. And once those people have a home, we can then look at providing the specific support these vulnerable people need.”

One Vision Housing is part of The Sovini Group and is a leading provider of social housing, managing approximately 14,000 homes across the North West. It is committed to creating opportunities and changing lives through the provision of quality homes and support services to help build thriving communities.

Liverpool’s £90m Plan To House City’s Homeless

The cost of housing homeless people in Liverpool could be as much as £90m in the next few years, reports the BBC.

Liverpool City Council said it had seen demand for temporary accommodation rise in recent years, in part due to cost-of-living pressures and so-called “no fault evictions”. While the council said it had managed to reduce the cost-per-night of putting people up, it needed to appoint a firm to manage housing up to 1,600 currently homeless families and individuals. It is set to appoint multinational firm Perk UK to run the contract, at a cost of about £20m per year.

The council has been increasing the amount of self-contained accommodation to reduce its reliance on hotels. There are now 1,330 units of self-contained accommodation in the city and the nightly rate is now typically £57, down from £83 previously. This has led to a reduction in the use of hotels, down to 277 rooms – and no families now spend more than six weeks there before being moved to other accommodation.

Housing cabinet member Hetty Wood said the council was “taking proactive steps through a number of schemes to make sure we have enough units of accommodation to give them a roof over their head whilst they find somewhere more permanent”. Just under 1,200 Merseyside households have been evicted from their homes through no fault of their own in the last two years. In 2024, so-called no-fault evictions were at a record high across the country and accounted for about half of the 1,977 notices served on tenants.

No-fault evictions allow a landlord to give a tenant notice that they must leave their home without having to demonstrate the tenant has done anything wrong such as failing to pay rent or damaging the property. In 2019, the Conservative government announced it would be ending the evictions, which are legal under Section 21 of the 1988 Housing Act. They are due to be abolished next year. But in the last year, they only accounted for about 14% of the evictions that took place on Merseyside.

A report to go before councillors on Tuesday said other factors in play were “family breakdowns and affordability concerns as rents increase and local housing allowance stay far below the market rents”. “This pressure is set against a challenging landscape that residents face with increasing economic demands and general health concerns all of which are contributing to the daily challenges faced by residents in securing and holding down suitable tenancies.”

The council will contract Perk UK Ltd to “book and manage interim and temporary accommodation services” for two years, with the total value of the contract expected to be about £90m”. City leaders are also working on finding 1,500 temporary and permanent accommodation places over the next 18 months, which they said would drastically reduce demand for what they called “nightly-rate” accommodation.

Wood added: “We recognise that there also needs to be an increase in the supply of affordable homes and are working with Government agencies, Liverpool City Region Combined Authority and social landlords to deliver affordable rent and rent-to-buy properties.”

Record-High Number Of People Sleeping Rough In England

A record-high 4,793 people were counted as sleeping rough across England in autumn 2025. Homelessness minister Alison McGovern has written to councils over reports children are homeless on the streets, reports the Big Issue.

Homelessness minister Alison McGovern has written to councils warning of families with children being left homeless on England’s streets as new government figures show record-high rough sleeping. The annual official rough sleeping snapshot counted an estimated 4,793 people sleeping rough across England on a single night in autumn 2025, higher than the previous peak of 4,751 people in 2017. The number of people sleeping rough has increased for the past four years in a row; the 2025 figure is up 3% on 2024.

Since the count began in 2010, rough sleeping levels have surged by 171%. The rise in rough sleeping comes as homelessness minister McGovern has written to councils to express “extreme concern” at reports from ITV News that families with children have been left sleeping rough. “This should never happen,” McGovern’s letter read.

Big Issue founder Lord John Bird said: “It’s deeply concerning that the government cannot get a grasp on rough sleeping. It’s clearly not enough to throw resources at pulling people out of homelessness, given the rate that people are falling victim to it. To turn off the tap, it’s high time Westminster turned its attention to unpicking the causes of this great wave of homelessness that massed under successive governments. Namely, kickstarting efforts to prevent and cure millions of the poverty that leaves them precariously close to losing their home.”

“We also need to end our overreliance on expensive and often unsuitable temporary accommodation, and invest in long-term prevention strategies, like bringing the 300,000 empty homes in England back into use as social and affordable housing. Government and the third sector should focus on finding people a sustainable exit route from rough sleeping that keeps them off the streets – the very principle the Big Issue was founded on 35 years ago.”

The Labour government unveiled its £3.6 billion homelessness strategy at the end of 2025, pledging to halve rough sleeping by 2030 and to reduce the number of families living in temporary accommodation This week, bidding also opened for Labour’s £39bn 10-year social and affordable homes programme, which is intended to boost the number of homes available for social rent. Meanwhile, ministers have announced two funds aimed at boosting community responses to homelessness and helping areas where rough sleeping is most acute to turn things around. But the latest statistics show the government has a mountain to climb to reduce rough sleeping in England. The annual snapshot found 8.2 people per 100,000 in England’s population are now sleeping rough with 43% of the country’s total located in London and the South East. The North West saw the biggest regional increase of 20%, rising from 367 in 2024 to 441 people in 2025. Three areas recorded a fall in the number of rough sleepers: Yorkshire and The Humber, East Midlands and London. The latter was down 3%. The majority of people sleeping rough in England are male, aged over 26 years old and from the UK.

Bonnie Williams, chief executive of Housing Justice said: “We are disappointed to see that the number of people being forced into rough sleeping around the country continues to rise. After years of growing numbers, we very much hope that this year will be a turning point. The underlying pressures that drive homelessness have not disappeared and while rough sleeping is the most visible form of homelessness, it is only part of the picture. The record numbers of households in temporary accommodation show just how many families are living in limbo. We welcome the government’s new homelessness strategy, particularly its stronger emphasis on prevention and early intervention. Preventing people from reaching crisis point, improving pathways out of temporary accommodation, and strengthening partnership working across housing, health and local government will be essential if we are to see sustained change.”

The single-night snapshot count is widely considered an underestimate of the number of people rough sleeping. The government also separately tracks rough sleeping over the month. That data found an estimated 8,010 people slept rough in December last year, up 7% on the same month a year previously. It’s not only on the streets where homelessness is rising. Separate government statistics showed 134,760 households were in temporary accommodation in September last year, up 1.8% from July and 7% higher than a year previously. Almost two-thirds of those households were families with children, meaning 175,990 kids were growing up in temporary accommodation across England – also a record high.

As the statistics were released, the government announced two new funds to reduce homelessness. The £37 million Ending Homelessness in Communities Fund will go to voluntary, community and faith groups often the first port of call for people in crisis. A further £15 million Long-Term Rough Sleeping Innovation Programme will target the 28 areas facing the greatest long-term rough-sleeping pressures, including London. The funding is intended to find joined-up solutions to get people off the streets for good. “We have to get our kids out of B&B accommodation, and it is good that today we see progress against this target. There are simply too many people facing life on the streets or in temporary accommodation. While today’s statistics show progress in some areas, it is clearly not good enough,” said homelessness minister McGovern.

“We are investing a record £3.6bn funding to tackle homelessness, including £50m announced today to help councils and voluntary groups often on the front line of helping the most vulnerable people and creating real change for those that need it most. We are reducing the worst forms of temporary accommodation with ongoing reductions of children in B&Bs. Our recently published National Plan to End Homelessness recognises the scale of the crisis with bold action to prevent homelessness before it occurs and make sure everyone has the safe, secure home that they deserve.”

More Than 1,600 Households Still In Temporary Accommodation Across Liverpool

The city council is to enter into a new contract in a bid to reduce the number of temporary beds needed, reports the Liverpool Echo.

More than 1,600 households across Liverpool are in temporary accommodation with some having to be housed outside the city. Homelessness continues to be one of the growing cost pressures facing Liverpool Council, with “unprecedented demand” on the city’s housing solutions service. With no fault evictions increasing prior to the Renters Rights Bill being introduced last year, family breakdowns and affordability concerns all adding to pressures, the local authority has found itself spending more and more on temporary housing. As of December last year, £23m had been allocated to provisions.

In a bid to get more people out of temporary solutions, Liverpool Council is proposing a contract award to booking system provider Perk UK Ltd for an initial period of two years worth £40m. This could go up to £90m if extended to four years. As of last year, there are around 1,600 households in interim and temporary accommodation with some placements made outside of the city when households are not able to be accommodated in the city safely due to specific circumstances. Under new terms agreed with Perk, their system will include placements in self-contained units of accommodation and hotel accommodation while further procurement is ongoing.

The rates for self-contained accommodation have been reduced to an average of £57 a night as the number of units has increased to more than 1,300. According to Liverpool Council, hotel use has been reduced to 277 rooms. No families are currently in hotel accommodation for more than six weeks. There are three families who have been placed via emergency placement and they have been in hotels for less than two weeks with move on into self-contained temporary accommodation expected imminently and as appropriate. Under the new contract, mobilisation of interim, temporary and permanent accommodation contracts is anticipated to begin in April 2026.

Delivery of approximately 1,500 units is anticipated to take up to 18 months.

The city council has accepted an ongoing need for B&B/hotel accommodation will remain however.

Councillor Hetty Wood, Liverpool Council cabinet member for housing, said: “The cost-of-living crisis in recent years has led to a huge increase in people needing temporary accommodation. In response to that, we are taking proactive steps through a number of schemes to make sure we have enough units of accommodation to give them a roof over their head while they find somewhere more permanent, rather than spending months in a hotel.”

“We have also negotiated reductions with landlords in the rates paid, to make sure that council taxpayers get value-for-money. This is all part of our wider homelessness action plan which includes bringing empty homes back into use for people who are on the housing waiting list. We recognise that there also needs to be an increase in the supply of affordable homes and are working with Government agencies, Liverpool City Region Combined Authority and social landlords to deliver affordable rent and rent-to-buy properties.”

Scotland’s Housing Crisis: Supply Has Failed To Keep Pace With Need

The country’s homelessness legislation is ambitious and humane, but too many people are still sleeping on the streets or in temporary accommodation, reports the Guardian.

Rough sleeping in Scotland has risen by 106% over the past three years. Record numbers of children are now living in temporary accommodation, official figures released this month show. In Glasgow, the city council leader warned last year that the authority had run out of temporary housing. This looks like a system approaching crisis point.

The paradox is that Scotland has some of the strongest homelessness protections in Europe. More than a decade ago, the Scottish parliament abolished the “priority need” test, creating a statutory duty on councils to secure permanent accommodation for all unintentionally homeless applicants. The charity Shelter considered Scotland to have had “the best homelessness law in Europe”. But having a legal right to a home doesn’t mean having a home. The trouble is that social and affordable housing supply has failed to keep pace with need – and temporary accommodation has become a bottleneck. People who have been put up in hotel rooms and B&Bs have no way of leaving due to high rents and a lack of social homes. As councils exhaust their options, rough sleeping begins to rise.

Welfare powers are largely reserved to Westminster. But building social homes is a devolved responsibility – leaving the Scottish National party, which has governed from Edinburgh since 2007, exposed. It has responded with plans for a new national housing agency to address criticism that the real failure here is housing supply. Analysts estimate that Scotland needs just under 16,000 new social homes each year to prevent homelessness rising further. In 2021, the SNP promised to deliver 110,000 affordable homes by 2032. However, it has fallen well short of that target. The Scottish government’s current commitment of 36,000 affordable homes over the next four years equates to around 9,000 per year, still far below the number required. Even those levels may be difficult to meet on the funding allocated. That all explains why homelessness continues to rise.

Perhaps Scotland should take a leaf out of Vienna’s book. It used public housing – built at scale and sustained over decades – so that it shapes the wider market rather than serving only as a safety net of last resort. Less than 1% of the population of Austria’s capital is homeless. The lesson here is that where public supply matches private provision, rents stabilise. Where it falls behind, the opposite occurs: costs rise and housing pressure intensifies. The plan for a new national housing agency by Scotland’s first minister, John Swinney is a welcome, if belated, recognition that the system is not working. A body with national oversight could direct investment where need is greatest. However, Mr Swinney’s language stresses efficiency and investment partnerships, not a Vienna-style expansion of public housing.

Every year that the government does not deal with its housing supply, the problem compounds and the number of homes that need to be built shoots up. The issue will surely be raised on the doorstep during campaigning for May’s Holyrood elections, and is likely to feature again in five years’ time. Until then, more people will sleep on cold streets or in cramped hotel rooms. Scotland’s homelessness legislation is ambitious and humane. The test now is whether the Scottish state can build at the scale required to deliver on that promise.

Everyone In Was ‘Missed Opportunity’ To End Rough Sleeping

The government’s Everyone In homelessness initiative launched at the start of the pandemic was a “missed opportunity” to end rough sleeping for good, the UK Covid-19 Inquiry has heard.

Acting for homelessness charity Shelter, Martin Westgate KC told a hearing for the inquiry’s final module on Tuesday (17 February) that “on its own terms”, the Everyone In programme was “undoubtedly a success”. In March 2020, ministers took the unprecedented step of asking councils to house those sleeping rough or at risk of it, in a move that prevented thousands of infections and hundreds of deaths from Covid, Mr Westgate said.

When the programme came to an end there was an “ambition” to move people on to permanent accommodation, but this did not materialise, according to Mr Westgate. “In common with others, Shelter considers this to be a missed opportunity to end rough sleeping,” he said, adding that numbers have now reverted to their pre-pandemic levels. According to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG), 37,000 people were helped under the scheme, yet Shelter’s research has found that fewer than a quarter of people accommodated had found settled housing.

In his evidence, Mr Westgate also highlighted several shortcomings with Everyone In, and said Shelter received frequent reports of people being unable to access services or being turned away. In one instance, a pregnant young woman who had been sleeping in a tent for a month was told she had to apply online despite explaining that her phone was broken and she did not have enough credit. A second major issue was adequate support for those who were accommodated, with many people coming off the streets while dealing with mental health crises or potentially life-threatening substance withdrawal.

Mr Westgate pointed to a report by the Dying Homeless Project that estimates there were 266 more deaths of people experiencing homelessness in 2020 compared to 2019, a 37% increase. Only 10 of those were Covid-related, but 50% of them were either from drug and alcohol use or suicide. Another “persistent problem” was how Everyone In coexisted with existing legal restrictions on accessing support and services for those without leave to remain or with no recourse to public funds.

Mr Westgate said that the initial advice from central government was inclusive and suggested that everyone was to be accommodated, regardless of their immigration status. “However, it didn’t identify any power under which authorities could provide support,” he said, adding that this led to confusion among councils. Earlier in the session, the inquiry heard from Aswini Weereratne KC, acting on behalf of the Migrant Rights Consortium (MRC), who said that migrants who were subject to immigration control during the pandemic had limited access to “protective and life-saving measures”, such as access to healthcare, benefits and housing.

In his evidence, Mr Westgate also pointed to the general state of housing going into the pandemic, with some 7.6 million households suffering at least one major problem relating to overcrowding, affordability or poor-quality living conditions. He pointed to evidence given earlier in the week by inquiry counsel Kate Blackwell KC, who said in her opening submission that people’s housing situations had a profound impact on how they experienced the pandemic. A report following a May 2025 roundtable with housing and homelessness organisations including Shelter, covered by Inside Housing last week, also highlighted the impact the pandemic had on housing and homelessness.

The UK Covid-19 Inquiry continues.

A New Homelessness Law In Wales Is Being Called ‘World-Leading’

The Homelessness and Social Housing Allocation (Wales) Bill has passed through the Senedd and will now become law. It promises to transform Wales’ homelessness system to focus on prevention, reports the Big Issue.

The Homelessness and Social Housing Allocation (Wales) Bill completed its journey through the Welsh parliament on Tuesday (10 February) with housing secretary Jane Bryant calling the law “bold and ambitious”. That’s because it aims to give people facing homelessness support a lot sooner to prevent them losing their home in the first place. Welsh public services will be required to work together to prevent homelessness while social housing will be allocated to those most at-risk.

“This bill is unique. It is rooted in the lived experience of homelessness and every part of the bill is a response to real experiences of the system,” said Bryant. More than 300 people with lived experience of homelessness were consulted on the bill. “Today is a real turning point for Wales. The bill will transform our homelessness system, moving away from one that responds to crisis and towards one that is firmly focused on prevention, because everyone deserves a safe place to call home. This bold and ambitious bill gives us the tools to create a fairer system, prevent homelessness, support people into permanent homes, and move closer to our long-term ambition of ending homelessness in Wales.”

As with other parts of the UK, Wales is facing a homelessness crisis. Last year, councils across the country recorded nearly 13,300 households as homeless and there are around 11,000 people living in temporary accommodation across the country. Under the new law, local authorities will have more tools to take action up to six months before a person falls into homelessness rather than the current 56-day limit.

That change was welcomed by Rhiannon – a Crisis member involved in shaping the bill. The charity co-ordinated an expert review panel to draw on the experience of people who have been homeless in the past in crafting the law. Rhiannon said: “Having just weeks to try and prevent my homelessness felt really restricting. There was no time and I had no space to breathe around it and plan. Having more time to work on preventing homelessness would make a big difference.” A new duty to ‘ask and act’ means public bodies such as health boards, social services, social landlords, prison governors and more will have to work together to prevent homelessness.

It’s one of many measures that Crisis chief executive Matt Downie described as “world-leading”. “This is truly a landmark day in Wales. The new Homelessness and Social Housing Allocation Bill has the potential to be life-changing for the thousands of people across Wales that are facing the trauma that comes from living without a stable place to call home,” said Downie. “The new law includes world-leading measures which aim to drive down high levels of homelessness and help to prevent people from being pushed into homelessness in the first place.”

It will also see care leavers will be given priority treatment when local authorities are allocating social housing. Shelter Cymru research has found that over 94,000 households in Wales – equivalent to one in every 14 households – are currently waiting for a social home. The bill will see the Welsh government take the lead on monitoring the level of demand for social homes following a recommendation from Shelter Cymru.

“As the national provider of independent homelessness and housing advice in Wales, we see every day the shortfalls of the current system and how this impacts people’s lives,” said Ruth Power, the charity’s CEO. “The Homelessness and Social Housing Allocation Bill offers one part of the solution to our housing emergency in Wales. For the bill to meet its aims, and provide transformative change for Wales, we must deliver the safe, secure and genuinely affordable social homes that people need – at scale and at pace.”

The Welsh government faced a race against time to get the legislation through the Senedd before May’s elections. The Homelessness and Social Housing Allocation (Wales) Bill was introduced in May 2025 – a year before the country heads to the polls. The law managed to pass three months before the election with measures set to come into force after the vote. When it was unveiled last year, ministers were aiming to axe priority need, which can prevent some people experiencing homelessness from accessing support, and intentionality – when a person is blocked from support for being judged to have made themselves intentionally homeless. The bill commits to scrapping both at an undefined future date.

Independent MS Rhys Ab Owen said in Tuesday’s debate: “I would have liked to have seen priority need and intentional homelessness coming to an end before the eighth Senedd, but that isn’t going to happen. It is a shame that it will not happen in the seventh Senedd.” The current Labour government is trailing behind Plaid Cymru in the polls. YouGov/ITV Wales polling, published last month, had Plaid Cymru securing 37% of the vote ahead of Reform UK on 23%, the Greens on 13% and Labour languishing on 10% alongside the Conservatives. Whoever comes out on top in May will face the challenge of implementing the new law.

“The work does not end here,” said Downie.”The Welsh government and incoming members of the Senedd after the elections in May 2026 must now invest in the proper implementation of these new laws. It is critical that services have the guidance, funding and resources to really deliver the ambition of the bill and work towards ending homelessness.”

Single Mothers Hit Hardest By Homelessness In ‘Nightmare’ Rental Market

More and more women are being ‘pushed towards homelessness’, reports the Independent.

“Women are affected by the housing crisis more than any other demographic,” says Katie*, 40, a single mother from East London. The mother-of-two is currently living in temporary accommodation after leaving an abusive relationship in late 2024, first spending a year in a hotel. Following the end of the relationship, she found herself unable to pay the £2,200 cost for the flat alone. Soon after, she was handed a Section 21 eviction notice by her landlord, and approached the council for help. They moved her and her four-year-old to a hotel in the neighbouring borough, which Katie says was “highly unsuitable”, adding: “it was one tiny room, it was completely run down [the hotel] was full of men coming and going”.

She is one of the tens of thousands of single mothers stuck in ‘hidden homelessness’, as new research from Shelter reveals how women are feeling the worst effects of the housing crisis. Analysis by the housing charity finds that women make up approximately 60 per cent of adults in homeless temporary accommodation, up 31 per cent over the past five years. This makes them approximately 80,000 of the roughly130,000 households in this situation. Strikingly, single mothers also make up a third (33 per cent) of all people in temporary accommodation, despite making up around 2 per cent of the UK population. This is up 13 per cent in the past five years, Shelter found, and means they represent over half (58 per cent) of all families in these settings.

The growing number is “totally unacceptable,” says Shelter’s chief executive Sarah Elliott, urging the government to take decisive action to ease the housing crisis. After legal intervention supported by Shelter, Katie was moved into a “tiny” two bedroom flat back in her borough, which she says is “basically one room, split into parts.” The small size of both settings means that, while she has had to look after her four-year-old, her 19-year-old daughter was unable to join and had to grapple with homelessness by herself. Katie said: “A 19-year-old going through homelessness, I think they carry so much more, and the shame. At that age, it’s just something that you don’t want to go through because it’s such an important part of someone’s life.”

Despite being unhappy with the situation, Katie says she is “scared to say anything” to her local council, because she doesn’t want to be moved back to a hotel. “[Women] are affected by it so much. We are the ones that will have the children, will look after the children – nine times out of ten it will be a woman,” she said. I would like to receive affordable property that would be a social property, so I can afford to work, and pay, and set down routes, and recover from the upheaval and trauma. I’d like to contribute to society and bring up my child the best that I can.”

Labour MP Stella Creasy told The Independent: “With a million women stuck on benefits because of caring commitments, it’s not a shock to me that many find themselves stuck in a nightmare of poor housing and debt. That’s why we need to overhaul our welfare state and childcare policies as well as recognise the discrimination they face in housing – their talents are going to waste, their kids are suffering and the costs of this failure to value them falls us all. Changing this should be a national priority”

One of the key causes of the rising homelessness among single mothers is the lack of affordability in the private rented sector. Recent research by the Women’s Budget Group found that average rents in England now cost 58 per cent of the average woman’s salary, compared to 42 per cent for men. Combined with the financial pressures of raising children – with women leading 89 per cent of single-parent families – the costs of the rental market prove too much for many, pushing more and more into homelessness.

Ms Elliot said: “It is totally unacceptable that, as the housing emergency escalates, a growing number of single mothers are homeless in temporary accommodation. No one should be forced to make the impossible choice between paying rent, feeding their family or turning on the heating – yet this is the reality for many single mothers across England today. Instead of being supported to stay in their homes, too many are being pushed towards homelessness, where they can spend years trapped in damaging temporary accommodation, unable to afford to move on and into private rentals.”

The charity chief points to the government’s decision to limit the amount of housing benefit people can received by maintaining the freeze on local housing allowance (LHA) as key factor, alongside skyrocketing rental prices. Around 57 per cent of housing benefit claimants with children are single mothers, equating to over 2,300 women. Ms Elliot added: “The government urgently needs to unfreeze LHA, so it covers at least the bottom third of local rents. Single mothers should not be left to bear the weight of the housing emergency alone.”

A government spokesperson said: “It is unacceptable that so many women are without a safe home and are having to live in unsuitable temporary accommodation. This has to change, which is why we investing £3.5 billion to tackle homelessness, plus £950 million for better-quality temporary accommodation and building 1.5 million homes, to help thousands of women out of temporary accommodation and into permanent homes.

This Government Must Make Private Rent More Affordable. Here’s How They Can Do It

The government can make our country affordable again for everyone. Ben Cooper, research manager at Fabian Housing Centre, writes in the Big Issue.

Millions of people are in a daily struggle to afford the roof over their head. Around 2.6 million people are pushed into poverty because their housing costs are so high. Housing is both a major monthly expense and a source of great insecurity, feeding a sense that this country is broken. With the government’s focus on the cost of living, ministers cannot afford to ignore this.

In recent months, the government has made some welcome progress on housing policy. Planning reform will help address the housing shortages that led to rapid price increases. A £250 cap on annual ground rents will reduce leaseholders’ bills. Government investment will deliver thousands more social homes each year, which will be genuinely affordable for people to rent. And the Renters’ Rights Act will limit rent increases to once a year, cut rent demanded in advance, and ban bidding wars. These are major successes that will improve many people’s lives.

But these policies must mark only the beginning of a more comprehensive set of measures to cut housing costs. By tackling this through comprehensive action, the government can make our country affordable again for everyone. Cutting costs must be embedded into every policy – so the 1.5m new homes target focus on delivering enough good quality, affordable homes to buy or rent, not just building lots of units that are expensive to buy and costly to run. And it is about the wider community that homes sit within. Well-designed places can ensure people have access to affordable services, like public transport.

The immediate priority is the private rented sector. Around one in five households rent privately. And, in December 2025, the average monthly rent in England was over £1,400 – up 4 per cent on a year earlier. Compared to a decade earlier, private rents have increased by £440 a month. This is no longer just a London problem either. The northeast and northwest saw the largest rent increases in 2025, both in percentage and cash amounts. Places like Bristol, Leeds and Trafford are as unaffordable as parts of London for the average private renter.

The recently passed Renters Rights’ Act is a really welcome piece of legislation that will provide security for private tenants, but it will do little to make renting more affordable. And without further reforms, landlords could try to push the costs of the required home improvements onto tenants. Landlords must be prevented from hiking up rents over the next few years to pay for their historic failure to invest in their properties.

This is why the Fabian Housing Centre is looking for solutions to improve the affordability of the private rented sector, particularly for those on the lowest incomes. We are exploring how to make local rents transparent, so tenants know if they are getting a good deal or not. There must also be better ways for renters to challenge unacceptable increases in practice, rather than getting bogged down in an overburdened legal system. It could be made easier for landlords to rent out to those who need Local Housing Allowance. Finally, we need a serious and evidence-based conversation about how to limit rent increases, perhaps by inflation or wage increases, without impacting on the supply of private rented homes.

The government is rightly prioritising both housing and the cost of living. These are urgent challenges that affect people every day. And while the challenge to improve housing affordability is significant. And while the challenge is significant, governments have successfully taken on big housing issues before. Ministers should be inspired by their Labour predecessors’ success in sweeping away slums and improving over a million social homes in the first decade of this century. This government could have a similar such an impressive and life changing legacy, repairing the belief that our country works again for ordinary people. But if it wants to show progress by the next election, work will need to start now.

Number Of Homeless Refugees In England Soars

The number of refugee households who are homeless or at risk of homelessness increased by more than 15,000 in four years, reports the BBC.

There has been a five-fold increase in the number of refugee households who are homeless or at risk of homelessness in the last four years, the BBC has found. Government data for England showed a rise from 3,560 in 2021/22, to 19,310 in 2024/25. Charities said the increase was a “direct result” of government policy, and blamed the 28-day period newly-recognised refugees are given to move out of Home Office accommodation – including hotels – as well as faster processing of claims by asylum seekers. The government said it was “committed” to helping refugees transition from asylum housing to their own accommodation and was working with local authorities “to mitigate the risk of homelessness”.

It comes as successive governments have struggled to get a grip on the UK’s overwhelmed asylum system, with a huge backlog of people waiting for decisions on claims and appeals. Processing had been slow and, at one point put on pause entirely, but Labour wants to speed up decisions – resulting in more people being granted refugee status and looking for somewhere to live. One charity supporting homeless refugees said it was mostly seeing young women under the age of 30 asking for help. Yusra, who arrived in the UK on a small boat after fleeing war in Sudan, is among them. The 26-year-old said her entire family was killed before she arrived in the UK.

She was placed in a government-funded asylum hotel for about five months but said, since she was granted refugee status in late August, she had been sleeping in a tent on the streets of Greater Manchester. “Sometimes drunk people come and try to open the tent and I start screaming,” Yusra said. “I can’t sleep until the morning.” In the days before she had to leave her Home Office accommodation, Yusra contacted her local council. However, as a single adult without children, she ranked as low priority for social housing. Yusra told the BBC she fled Sudan for a better life but now regretted coming to the UK, saying life has been “very difficult” since becoming homeless. She is one of many refugees receiving support from the Stockport Race Equality Partnership.

Once an asylum seeker is given refugee status they have 28 days to move out of government-funded accommodation – usually a house in multiple occupation (HMO) or a hotel – and find their own housing. At the same time, they must find work or, if necessary, apply for universal credit. The government has said it usually takes about 35 days to receive an initial universal credit payment. As a result, charities have said many refugees are not able to secure housing or benefits before their asylum support ends.

Jasmine Basran, Head of Policy & Campaigns for national homelessness charity Crisis, said 28 days was not enough time for refugees to sort everything. She said the charity was seeing the highest rise in homelessness among refugees and the true number without a home was likely to be even higher, as government data only counts those who notify their local authority.

According to the latest figures, London and the North West – including Manchester and Liverpool – have the highest proportion of refugees who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. The west London borough of Hillingdon saw the sharpest increase – 2,098 homeless households in the area were refugees in 2024/25, up from 71 in 2021/22.

Refugees must seek support from an area they have a local connection to, which is often where their asylum accommodation is. Hillingdon houses a higher number of asylum seekers due to its proximity to Heathrow Airport. In December, the National Audit Office released a damning report into the asylum system, finding a succession of “short-term, reactive” government policies had moved problems elsewhere, increasing levels of homelessness. Its criticisms highlighted changes to the 28-day move-on period, a drive to clear inherited asylum backlogs shifting pressure onto appeals, and a shortage of judges creating court backlogs.

Last year, the Labour government ran a pilot increasing the 28-day period for people granted asylum to 56 days, but this ended early, in September, when it reverted back to 28 days.  In 2023, for some refugees, that period shrunk to seven days after the government briefly changed how the move-on period was calculated. The policy was reversed, with the British Red Cross saying it had led to “devastating levels of destitution”. The 56 day move-on period pilot was, however, extended for those deemed vulnerable – including pregnant women, families with children and disabled people. It was due to end in January 2026, but is understood to still be in place.

It comes as the latest Home Office figures suggest 110,000 people claimed asylum in the year ending September 2025 – a 13% increase on the previous year. As of September last year, there were 108,085 people in asylum accommodation, with more than 36,000 in hotels and the majority in shared housing, such as HMOs. Asylum accommodation contracts have cost the government billions of pounds. The government has pledged to clear the backlog of asylum seekers waiting for their claim to be decided, to close “every asylum hotel” and cut asylum costs, adding that “more suitable” sites were being brought forward to “ease pressure on communities”.

But Jacqui Broadhead, director of the Global Exchange on Migration and Diversity at the University of Oxford, said a “long-term reimagining” of asylum policies may be required. She suggested one solution was to invest in more temporary accommodation instead of paying private providers to oversee asylum accommodation sites such as hotels. After initially being used to help the asylum backlog, she said it could aid the housing shortage more generally. She highlighted the importance of co-ordination between local authorities and the Home Office, adding that increased and faster decision-making on asylum claims can “put very high levels of pressure” on housing services that are already “extremely stretched”.