‘Every Time I Take It Now I’m Scared’ – Horrifying Reality Facing Liverpool’s Drug Users

Liverpool Echo Special Report: As batches of highly potent and hugely dangerous synthetic opiates circulate in the region, those trapped in addiction on the streets are staring death in the face each time they use.

“It was like the exorcist, my body was rejecting everything. Then I woke up in the hospital.” These are the words of Paul. He’s 46, homeless and has been using heroin for the past decade. Last week he was moments from death. He came to smoke the drug as he does most days, but immediately felt something was different. “As soon as I smoked it, it was like a whole different world,” he explains. He says he began violently projectile vomiting like he had never done before, before losing consciousness and waking up in the Royal Liverpool Hospital, having been taken there by his cousin.  Paul, who is originally from Huyton but now beds down in Liverpool city centre each night, believes he is one of many victims of a contaminated batch of heroin that has been circulating in Merseyside and is linked to two deaths and many overdoses, largely within the region’s homeless and rough sleeper communities.

The Echo first revealed in late April that the dangerous drugs were present in the region after they were linked to the death of a 62-year-old man in Southport. Earlier this month we reported on a second linked death in the Wirral area after the contaminated batch was discovered there. A man has now been charged with drug offences linked to the investigation into the contaminated batch. The Cheshire and Merseyside Drug Local Information System has confirmed that a batch or possibly multiple batches of heroin have been located in the region, with forensic testing identifying the synthetic opioid etonitazene, a highly toxic, synthetic benzimidazole opioid, in the supply. This substance is part of the wider nitazenes group, which are far stronger than heroin -sometimes 100 times stronger – and dramatically increase the risk of overdose and death.

Paul says the drugs he consumed in Liverpool city centre just over a week ago contained nitazenes. “I was in hospital for two days. I was close to dying. It wasn’t through injecting, it was through smoking. So I reckon it was laced with something. Nitazenes are the worst. I know it was that, because the day before I was fine after smoking three or four things. The next day I smoked one and it was game over. When they did the blood test I think they said it was those nitazenses. They said I was a very lucky man.” Paul’s harrowing near-death experience has obviously left him scared to take what he believes to be heroin again, but like other addicts, he finds himself in an impossible and dangerous situation.

“When you go through something like that you feel terrible, but then you go and take it again because you have to,” he explains with a grimace. “I actually need it to make me better because the withdrawals are so bad.” Paul, who says he became homeless when his marriage broke down ten years ago, says he is desperate to get clean but is finding this almost impossible while living on the streets in Liverpool, where drugs and drug-taking is all around him. He says he best way for him to get clean now would be to get himself into prison, adding: “You actually get more help in prison. It’s the safest place for me. I get three meals, a warm bed and it’s harder to do drugs. Because every time I take it now I’m scared, but I need to take it. That’s the risk I have to take.” He’s far from the only one in this terrifying position.

Elsewhere in the city centre, Jimmy, Kyle and Shaz are talking about the contaminated drugs and the worries they now have. Kyle says he has been homeless on and off since he was a kid after coming through the care system. Asked if he is a heroin addict he smiles and asks: “Does a bear s*** in the woods?” He’s angry at the dealers who are now bringing these dangerous substances to the streets and putting him and his friends in grave danger. “Once you are immersed in addiction, this is just part of it,” he explains. “If the drugs are contaminated and you end up with it then you take that chance. It’s hundreds of times stronger with those nitazenes, that’s what kills you.” He adds: “The problem is, when you buy a bag of heroin, you don’t know what’s in it. These dealers are just greedy b*******. There is no need for them to do this.”

The three friends are currently living in a large tent in the city centre. 31-year-old Shaz, who is walking with crutches due to a leg injury, tells us she has been on the streets since she was 17. Originally from Ireland she also came through the care system before her life spiralled out of control. She is now fearful of what each hit of heroin could mean for her. “I know people who have died,” she tells us. “But it is what it is when you are an addict. You are taking that risk. I am a user. It is quite scary but it is a risk that we have to take when you are an addict and you are rattling” (suffering from withdrawal symptoms).”

Mark Whitfield is an associate professor in substance abuse at John Moores University. He explained more about the dangers of the nitazenes that have made their way into the Merseyside drug supply. He states: “Nitazenes are a group of highly potent synthetic opioids that have emerged in recent years in the illicit drug supplies, mainly as adulterants. So they will particularly be in Heroin but will appear in things like benzodiazepines as well. Part of the reason they are potentially appearing more is because of the reduced purity of Heroin in recent years, which has been affected by the reduced supply of heroin coming from Afghanistan. So we are seeing more synthetic substances appearing in traditional drugs without people realising. The issue is that they are significantly stronger. We know that some variations are potentially over one hundred times more potent than heroin, so only a small amount would be needed to cause an overdose.”

So the risks are huge. But for those trapped in the cycle of addiction on the streets of this region, they are risks they feel they have to take. Shaz, who has been a user of heroin on and off for 15 years adds: “When you are rattling then you are taking it, simple as. If it is a bad batch, then that’s on you. We know it’s a chance we are all taking. We are just trying to survive.”

Rent Caps Needed To Help Homeless, Charity Says

Rising rent costs are pushing more people into rough sleeping and the new Renters Rights’ Act needed to go further to support those in hardship, reports the BBC.

The act came into force on 1 May and banned no-fault evictions, ended fixed-term tenancies and introduced new rules to stop bidding wars meaning renters cannot be asked to pay more than the advertised price. Salford Loaves and Fishes, which supports homeless and vulnerable people in the city, said it was concerned it had not introduced caps on how much private landlords can increase rent. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) said it was “not looking at rent controls” as they could cause higher rents.

The latest government figures showed north-west England has seen a 20% increase in rough sleepers year-on-year, up from 367 in 2024 to 441 in 2025. The figures showed Salford had a particular spike, with an estimated count going from 18 in 2024 to 41 in 2025.

Sam spent time living on the streets before being placed in supported accommodation. However, after securing a job as a support worker, he had to leave, due to the rules governing the accommodation, and is now being supported by the Salford charity. The 27-year-old said it was “getting harder and harder” to find somewhere affordable. “I’m living with a friend of mine at the moment… I don’t have any choice so it’s very hard for me,” he said. Even though I’m working at the moment I couldn’t find an affordable house. The only affordable houses are council houses but I can’t find [one].”

Debbie, who has also been helped by the charity, said the support it offered was a lifeline. “It’s living in temporary accommodation, sleeping on friends’ settees… it can be just about anything.” She said she had been “quite lucky” as her medical issues meant she had “got somewhere pretty quickly, but I know people that have been bidding for three or four years [on social housing] and not getting anywhere”.

Jenni Smith, chief executive of the charity, said the number of homeless people it supported was rising. “I started over four years ago and our numbers keep increasing year-on-year. We average about 160 new people every month as well.” She said the new legislation did not go far enough and more was needed to help people in hardship. “There are no caps on how much private landlords can increase rent, so that’s the main thing that’s causing people to be in this situation. There are things that they’re trying to do to make a difference, but unless private rent is capped… at social housing costs within the area, it’s never going to stop and that’s something that only central government can change.”

An MHCLG spokesperson said the act “bans no-fault evictions, it bans unfair rent increases and allows people to request a pet in their home as well”. However, they added the government was “not looking at rent controls”. “The reason we’re not doing that is when this was introduced by the Scottish government… it ended with rents going much higher and the amount of homes available going down,” they added.

‘Every Time I Take It Now I’m Scared’ – Horrifying Reality Facing Liverpool’s Drug Users

Special report: As batches of highly potent and hugely dangerous synthetic opiates circulate in the region, those trapped in addiction on the streets are staring death in the face each time they use repots the Liverpool Echo.

“It was like the exorcist, my body was rejecting everything. Then I woke up in the hospital.” These are the words of Paul. He’s 46, homeless and has been using heroin for the past decade. Last week he was moments from death. He came to smoke the drug as he does most days, but immediately felt something was different. “As soon as I smoked it, it was like a whole different world,” he explains. He says he began violently projectile vomiting like he had never done before, before losing consciousness and waking up in the Royal Liverpool Hospital having been taken there by his cousin. Paul, who is originally from Huyton but now beds down in Liverpool city centre each night, believes he is one of many victims of a contaminated batch of heroin that has been circulating in Merseyside and is linked to two deaths and many overdoses, largely within the region’s homeless and rough sleeper communities.

The Echo first revealed in late April that the dangerous drugs were present in the region after they were linked to the death of a 62-year-old man in Southport. Earlier this month we reported on a second linked death in the Wirral area after the contaminated batch was discovered there. A man has now been charged with drug offences linked to the investigation into the contaminated batch. The Cheshire and Merseyside Drug Local Information System has confirmed that a batch or possibly multiple batches of heroin have been located in the region, with forensic testing identifying the synthetic opioid etonitazene, a highly toxic, synthetic benzimidazole opioid, in the supply. This substance is part of the wider nitazenes group, which are far stronger than heroin – sometimes 100 times stronger – and dramatically increase the risk of overdose and death.

Paul says the drugs he consumed in Liverpool city centre just over a week ago contained nitazenes. “I was in hospital for two days. I was close to dying. It wasn’t through injecting, it was through smoking. So I reckon it was laced with something. Nitazenes are the worst. I know it was that, because the day before I was fine after smoking three or four things. The next day I smoked one and it was game over. When they did the blood test I think they said it was those nitazenses. They said I was a very lucky man.” Paul’s harrowing near-death experience has obviously left him scared to take what he believes to be heroin again, but like other addicts, he finds himself in an impossible and dangerous situation. “When you go through something like that you feel terrible, but then you go and take it again because you have to,” he explains with a grimace. “I actually need it to make me better because the withdrawals are so bad.”

Paul, who says he became homeless when his marriage broke down ten years ago, says he is desperate to get clean but is finding this almost impossible while living on the streets in Liverpool, where drugs and drug-taking is all around him. He says he best way for him to get clean now would be to get himself into prison, adding: “You actually get more help in prison. It’s the safest place for me. I get three meals, a warm bed and it’s harder to do drugs. Because every time I take it now I’m scared, but I need to take it. That’s the risk I have to take.” He’s far from the only one in this terrifying position.

Elsewhere in the city centre, Jimmy, Kyle and Shaz are talking about the contaminated drugs and the worries they now have. Kyle says he has been homeless on and off since he was a kid after coming through the care system. Asked if he is a heroin addict he smiles and asks: “Does a bear s*** in the woods?” He’s angry at the dealers who are now bringing these dangerous substances to the streets and putting him and his friends in grave danger. “Once you are immersed in addiction, this is just part of it,” he explains. “If the drugs are contaminated and you end up with it then you take that chance. It’s hundreds of times stronger with those nitazenes, that’s what kills you.” He adds: “The problem is, when you buy a bag of heroin, you don’t know what’s in it. These dealers are just greedy b*******. There is no need for them to do this.”

The three friends are currently living in a large tent in the city centre. 31-year-old Shaz, who is walking with crutches due to a leg injury, tells us she has been on the streets since she was 17. Originally from Ireland she also came through the care system before her life spiralled out of control. She is now fearful of what each hit of heroin could mean for her. “I know people who have died,” she tells us. “But it is what it is when you are an addict. You are taking that risk. I am a user. It is quite scary but it is a risk that we have to take when you are an addict and you are rattling” (suffering from withdrawal symptoms).”

Mark Whitfield is an associate professor in substance use at John Moores University. He explained more about the dangers of the nitazenes that have made their way into the Merseyside drug supply. He states: “Nitazenes are a group of highly potent synthetic opioids that have emerged in recent years in the illicit drug supplies, mainly as adulterants. So they will particularly be in Heroin but will appear in things like benzodiazepines as well. Part of the reason they are potentially appearing more is because of the reduced purity of Heroin in recent years, which has been affected by the reduced supply of heroin coming from Afghanistan. So we are seeing more synthetic substances appearing in traditional drugs without people realising. The issue is that they are significantly stronger. We know that some variations are potentially over one hundred times more potent than heroin, so only a small amount would be needed to cause an overdose.”

So the risks are huge. But for those trapped in the cycle of addiction on the streets of this region, they are risks they feel they have to take. Shaz, who has been a user of heroin on and off for 15 years adds: “When you are rattling then you are taking it, simple as. If it is a bad batch, then that’s on you. We know it’s a chance we are all taking. We are just trying to survive.”

Support For London’s Rough Sleepers To Be Revisited After Closure Of Capital’s Only Homeless Drug And Alcohol Clinic

LBC previously highlighted warnings that the loss London’s only homeless detox clinic in March would “undoubtedly” lead to a loss of lives and increased pressure on A&E departments.

On Thursday – less than an hour before Mr Streeting resigned from the Government and called for Sir Keir Starmer to step down – a government spokesperson announced that plans are moving forward for replacement addiction support for the homeless in London. London local authorities will begin inviting tenders for a different, “more sustainable” service in June, the spokesperson said. The U-turn comes after LBC reported in March that London’s only existing hospital unit providing addiction treatment for rough sleepers in need of support would close on cost grounds. The de-commissioning of the Addiction Clinical Care Suite at St Thomas’ Hospital left open the possibility that homeless people in London requiring treatment for drug and alcohol addiction could be left on the streets without access to life-saving support.

At the time, LBC highlighted warnings that the loss of the clinic, which has treated 1,000 patients since it opened in 2021, would “undoubtedly” lead to a loss of lives and increased pressure on A&E departments. Mr Streeting pledged to look into the decision after he was challenged on the closure by LBC’s Nick Ferrari. Just after 12pm on Thursday – less than an hour before Mr Streeting resigned as he mulls a potential leadership bid – spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Care confirmed:  “Rising costs meant the London boroughs determined the service was no longer affordable – with a £1 million shortfall and times when beds were underused. They are inviting tenders for a more sustainable service and ministers have requested further advice on future provision.”

The spokesperson added interim support was being provided for patients, including “additional inpatient detoxification beds and access to intermediate care beds at the Mildmay Hospital for homeless patients following inpatient care, supported through additional national funding for London.” The department explained that the pan-London Inpatient Detoxification Programme was established in 2021 to address a significant decline in inpatient detoxification provision across the capital. Central government funds were brokered resulting in the commissioning of the Addictions Clinical Care Suite at St Thomas’ Hospital, with priority access for people sleeping rough. However by 2025 the cost of delivering the service had risen beyond the level of available grant funding. The contract ended in March 2026 and the clinic closed in April.

The service will go out to tender in June with applications due by July. In the meantime, the department has put in place a series of interim measures including additional access for London residents with complex needs who previously used the service to Inpatient detoxification providers outside of the capital. There are also ongoing conversations about the possibility of extending the Mildmay pilot. The detox unit was established in 2021 to “save the lives of some of the city’s most vulnerable people and provide them with an avenue to get off the streets for good.” It provided medical supervision to homeless people battling severe addiction issues, whose withdrawal from drugs or alcohol could result in delirium tremors, seizures or, in the most serious cases, death. Shortly before Christmas, however, staff at the unit were notified that funding for the Additional Clinical Care Suite had been withdrawn.

“We have been notified by the City of London Corporation (our commissioner) that funding for the Addiction Clinical Care Suite will cease from 31 March 2026,” an internal memo from Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust, seen by LBC, says. “In recognition of the outstanding work undertaken by the team and the excellent outcomes achieved for patients,” the note continues, “Trust senior management have worked extensively to explore alternative options to sustain the service. Unfortunately, in the current challenging financial climate, this has not been possible.” Neither the City of London Corporation nor the government department appeared willing to take responsibility for the decision to close the unit.

The Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Trust suggested the decision lay with the City of London Corporation, which in turn declined to comment and directed enquiries to the Department of Health and Social Care – with a spokesperson subsequently stating responsibility lay back with the local authority. Data from the Museum of Homelessness shows that 710 people died as a result of drug and alcohol issues in 2024 alone, representing 44% of total deaths among the homeless community. “It’s clearly a false economy,” one insider, who spoke to LBC on the condition of anonymity, previously lamented. “All that’s going to happen is that we’re going to see more and more addicts presenting at A&E departments as a last resort, when they are seriously, seriously ill – piling more pressure on staff. Lives are going to be lost – I have no doubt about that whatsoever.”

Though the service was commissioned by the City of London Corporation, its funding was made up of a series of grants from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government as well as local authority treatment budgets, which are primarily sourced from the Department of Health and Social Care. In December, the government’s Homelessness Strategy identified “the continued delivery of targeted and specialist drug and alcohol treatment and support” as one of the measures needed to meet the objective of halving the number of rough sleepers by 2029.

Speaking to LBC, Lord Bird, who has campaigned extensively to support homeless people and founded the Big Issue in 1991, said the closure of the facility will result in significant additional pressure on a host of other services. “People end up on the streets for all sorts of reasons, [but] I would say the greatest commonality is around drink and drugs,” the non-affiliated peer argued. “These people will end up in prisons, back on the streets, being more chaotic, filling up A&E. It is a kind of terrible reality that it is a short cost-cutting exercise. What they’re really doing is passing the responsibility back to police officers, social workers, and members of the public. So really what we’re doing is pushing the problems back onto the streets.”

In an interview with Nick Ferrari, the former Health Secretary opened the door to a review of the decision to shut the unit’s doors. “I am going to go away and look at this,” Mr Streeting said. “I look at homeless people on our streets, I look at people with drug and alcohol addiction and it’s no exaggeration to say there but for the grace of God go I. There are so many people in this country who are one or two missed paydays away from being homeless. I’ve seen drug and alcohol addiction in my own family, particularly one of my grandparents, my granddad, who was in and out of prison throughout my childhood, my mum’s childhood. He had suffered terrible abuse as a child and a terrible relationship with alcohol throughout his life. So I’ve seen the worst of some of this. We can’t write these people off, we can’t just say it’s all their fault.”

The former Minister is now reportedly trying to amass the support required to trigger a leadership challenge as beleaguered Prime Minister Keir Starmer struggles to cling onto power after a poor showing in last week’s local elections which saw the party wiped out in its traditional northern heartlands.

On Thursday, James Murray was appointed as the new health secretary following Mr Streeting’s resignation. According to a 2021 review on drug treatment and recovery by Dame Carol Black, each £1 spent on treatment saves £4 through reduced demands on health, prison, law enforcement and emergency services.

Police Force Hands Out Sleep Pods For Homeless

Some Neighbourhood Policing teams in the North East are carrying emergency shelters, known as Sleep Pods, to help the homeless, reports the BBC.

Durham Constabulary has been given 100 Sleep Pods to provide temporary shelter to people sleeping rough and helping protect them from the elements. Officers can distribute the pods to vulnerable people they meet and record their location to share with local support services. Matt Foggin, PCSO with Bishop Auckland Neighbourhood Policing Team, said the initiative had been effective as a first step. He said: “We can put that intervention into place and hopefully that person is a little bit safer for that night until mainstream services can get involved.”

The Bishop Auckland Neighbourhood Policing team started working with local homelessness charity, Cornerstone Supported Housing and Counselling, about a year ago. The charity is a regional distribution hub for Sleep Pods, and regularly gives them to individuals across County Durham and Hartlepool who are sleeping rough. The pods allow them to mark individual locations and set up continued support.

Sleep Pod, the charity behind the emergency shelters, donated 100 units to Durham Police for officers to hand out in April. Each of the 21 neighbourhood policing teams carry between three and five pods. Nicky Morson, communication and support lead at Cornerstone, said this partnership offered an exciting step forward in confronting the issue of homelessness. “The whole point of the police carrying Sleep Pods is to give people they are finding, who are rough-sleeping, an option,” she said. “Before, if they hadn’t been too naughty, they couldn’t get locked up – or if they weren’t poorly enough, they couldn’t go to hospital. And they were left. But with a Sleep Pod, they can be sighted.”

PCSO Foggin said, previously, officers would try to support individuals to return to their families, or anywhere else where they could stay among friends, but found that in some cases – due to offending behaviour – the people who found themselves homeless had “burnt all [their] bridges”. Now the police are able to distribute Sleep Pods, those isolated individuals can stay safe, and officers can notify Cornerstone to provide additional support. He said the carrying the pods gave officers peace of mind, “The benefit is knowing we can do that little bit extra. We are the neighbourhood policing team, so it is for the community – we make people safer and, hopefully, reduce crime and offending behaviour.”

Access Denied: Why Is Treatment Still So Hard To Reach For People Experiencing Homelessness?

For people experiencing homelessness, accessing substance use treatment is rarely straightforward, writes Chris Annison at Phoenix Futures.

Fragmented systems, strict criteria and the limitations of borough-based boundaries often leave people excluded before they have even had a chance to engage. At Phoenix Futures, our Regional Homeless Engagement with Substance Use Treatment (RhEST) service works to remove these barriers.

RhEST is the only pan-London substance use service, operating across 32 local authorities, each with its own structures and commissioning arrangements. Meanwhile, the people we support frequently move across boroughs, often out of necessity rather than choice. Traditional services, tied to specific geographical areas, can struggle to maintain contact when someone’s life does not remain within one set of boundaries. Our role is to bridge those gaps and ensure that access to treatment does not depend on having a stable postcode.

Our team focuses on building trusted relationships with people facing multiple disadvantage. Many have complex physical, mental and social needs. Consistency is vital, yet difficult to achieve within a system not designed for mobility. By working across boroughs, RhEST can stay alongside people no matter where they move, advocating for them when their circumstances do not neatly fit the criteria expected by commissioned services.

Recently we were involved in an initiative to develop a Rough Sleeper Pathway, designed to provide immediate hospital care for people sleeping rough with urgent health needs. This short-term project also included limited funding for residential treatment placements. The pathway enabled people to receive rapid access to physical and mental health assessments, stabilisation in a safe clinical environment and the breathing space to think about accommodation and treatment options.

Because RhEST already works pan-London and has strong relationships with a wide range of services, we were identified as the most suitable team to coordinate referrals. We worked closely with partners including the London Navigators, Homeless Health providers, Rough Sleeper teams, day centres, outreach workers and community treatment services. Together, we moved quickly, securing admissions within days of the funding becoming available. During the short period the pathway operated, 15 people were admitted for hospital-based stabilisation and 11 of those went on to residential treatment afterwards. This is a substantial increase compared to previous years when no equivalent pathway or funding existed, and it clearly demonstrates what becomes possible when the system is allowed to flex around people’s needs.

Throughout the project, we saw how fragmented and complex the system can be for people to navigate. RhEST played a pivotal role in bringing together the right agencies to make the pathway work. Most importantly, we listened to the people using our service. Instead of asking them to fit the system, we made the system work around them. The flexibility built into the pathway meant we could respond to the realities of homelessness, advocating for people whose situations often fall outside standard criteria. We saw people previously considered “unsuitable” for residential treatment flourish when finally given the opportunity.

The project also highlighted how easily people can be excluded through assumptions about “lack of engagement”. For example, some participants faced barriers that made standard preparation groups inaccessible. In one instance, a person with neurodivergent needs was unable to attend these sessions, yet this was misinterpreted as “low motivation”. In other cases, people in coercive or unsafe relationships struggled to attend appointments and were similarly judged as disengaged. Looking more closely at individuals’ circumstances made it clear these expectations were unrealistic and unfair. The pathway created space to understand these barriers and respond appropriately.

RhEST’s involvement was about more than referrals; it was about building trust in a system where trust has often been lost. Many of the people we engaged would previously have remained on the periphery of services because the pace and structure of traditional pathways do not align with the realities of rough sleeping. A trauma-informed, motivational approach was vital to the pathway’s success. This short-term funding showed what is possible when commissioning frameworks allow for flexibility. People experiencing homelessness often require more time, more consistency and a more personalised approach than standard services can currently offer. A pan-London model has proved highly effective in maintaining engagement for those who frequently move boroughs, and it highlights the need for greater discretion in decision-making around residential treatment.

We fully appreciate that funding for placements is a major consideration for commissioners. However, we would welcome a shift that allows teams greater latitude where conventional engagement expectations are unrealistic. People experiencing homelessness deserve the same access to treatment as those in stable housing, and achieving equity requires systems that reflect the complexity of their lives. Once trust is established and people begin to engage, opportunities should be genuinely equal. As a sector we talk often about holistic and person-centred care; this work has shown clearly that flexibility must be part of that. Embracing the differences in people’s circumstances and widening the door for those facing the greatest challenges is essential if we are serious about improving access. The Rough Sleeper Pathway proved that, with understanding and adaptability, treatment can be accessible and transformative, for people experiencing homelessness.

Homes For Rough Sleepers: Andy Burnham Backs Housing First

 

Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham has previously called for ‘change’ in the Labour party. What does he want that change to look like? The Big Issue speculates.

Andy Burnham might have found a new route to parliament after Makerfield MP Josh Simons resigned to give the Greater Manchester mayor the opportunity to challenge Keir Starmer for Labour leadership. As Starmer’s popularity continues to plummet, some Labour MPs are reportedly looking for an alternative leader. Such designs have long-centred on Greater Manchester’s mayor, who has previously called for “change” in the Labour Party and openly criticised Starmer’s leadership. But the two-time leadership candidate would need to return to parliament first.

It was thought that Andrew Gwynne’s departure from his Gorton and Denton seat would offer Burnham the chance to become an MP again but Starmer and the National Executive Committee blocked him from standing. That decision saw the Green Party’s Hannah Spencer take the seat. But there are no such practical hurdles to stop the so-called ‘King in the North’ plotting a Westminster return this time around after Starmer confirmed he wouldn’t stand in Burnham’s way. Announcing his intention to stand, Burnham said: “There is only so much that can be done from Greater Manchester. Much bigger change is needed at a national level if everyday life is to be made more affordable again. This is why I now seek people’s support to return to parliament: to bring the change we have brought to Greater Manchester to the whole of the UK and make politics work properly for people.”

In the spirit of said speculation, we at Big Issue have asked experts: What would Andy Burnham’s Britain look like? Here are some of the key policies he’s implemented in Manchester, and how they could be rolled out elsewhere.

Burnham’s flagship homelessness policy is Housing First: giving rough sleepers a permanent home immediately, with wraparound support, rather than making housing conditional on sobriety or other criteria. Since Greater Manchester’s pilot launched in 2019, more than 450 people have been housed, with an 88% tenancy sustainment rate. Rough sleeping in the city has fallen by more than 57% since 2017, bucking the national trend.

“I started using the phrase housing is a human right, when I’d come back from Finland,” Burnham told the Big Issue in a 2023 interview. “People kept talking about Housing First and I kind of thought it was a project. But it actually came over to me when I was there that housing first is a national philosophy in Finland. If people talk about prevention, if you want a true prevention policy for the country, you give everybody a good, secure home. So, it’s not an unrealistic policy, I think it’s a very realistic policy and I’m really committed to it.”

Gideon Salutin of the Social Market Foundation says the numbers back Burnham up. “It’s one of the rare homelessness interventions with a very strong evidence base,” he tells Big Issue. “Internationally, tenancy sustainment rates are consistently above 80%, and Greater Manchester’s results match that. The costs of providing housing and support are outweighed by savings to health services, criminal justice and emergency accommodation.”

But a national rollout would be a major undertaking. In 2021, the Centre for Social Justice estimated that there were 1,995 Housing First places available in England, with between 16,450 and 29,700 places required. “If Burnham were prime minister and made Housing First a national philosophy, as Finland has, we could dramatically reduce rough sleeping within a decade,” Salutin says. “But it would take serious long-term investment and a coordinated building programme – without that, the model can’t work at scale.”

On housing more broadly, Burnham has called on the government to borrow £40 billion to build new council housing. “We’ve got to get beyond this thing of being in hock to the bond markets,” he said.

Boost For Sadiq Khan As Rough Sleeping In London Plummets

The Mayor of London told Big Issue it would take until 2026 to see the number of homeless people on London’s streets fall. New official statistics have proven him right.

The number of people sleeping rough on London’s streets fell by more than 10% in the first three months of 2026 – just as Mayor of London Sadiq Khan promised Big Issue last year. Khan, who has pledged an end to rough sleeping in London by 2030, told Big Issue in January 2025 that he didn’t expect to see surging numbers on the street fall until 2026. Official figures, released on Thursday (30 April), recorded 3,944 people sleeping rough in London between January and March this year, down 11% on the same period last year and 18% lower than in October to December 2025.

John Glenton, chief care and support officer at Riverside, said the fall is the largest percentage reduction in the number of people sleeping rough in London for eight years, outside of the Covid pandemic. “We remain hopeful that the Mayor of London’s ongoing efforts to eliminate rough sleeping by 2030 will see the number of people sleeping rough in London continue to fall during 2026,” said Glenton. “However, to reduce rough sleeping and homelessness long-term it is crucial that the government’s value for money review resets homelessness funding, so more money goes to services which prevent homelessness and rough sleeping and less on temporary accommodation.”

The Combined Homelessness and Information Network (CHAIN) statistics counted 1,762 people sleeping rough for the first time between January and March – a 15% fall year-on-year. Just over three quarters spent one night on the streets. A total of 641 people were recorded as living on the streets long-term, down 9% on the same period last year and 23% lower than in October to December 2025. Khan, who is marking 10 years as mayor next month, revealed his ‘plan of action’ to end rough sleeping in London by 2030 in May last year, promising to focus on prevention. The London mayor announced refurbishment of up to 500 new empty homes, a new Ending Homelessness Hub and a dedicated rough sleeping prevention phone line. The plan was backed with £17 million in government funding.

A spokesperson for the Mayor of London said: “This shows important progress, but there is clearly still a lot more work to do to end rough sleeping for good by 2030. Since 2016, 20,000 people have been helped off the streets, and the mayor will continue to work closely with the government, London Councils and the homelessness sector to tackle rough sleeping and build a safer, fairer London for everyone.”

Rick Henderson, CEO at Homeless Link, said the mayor’s plan “likely played a role in this change” and described the falling figures as “encouraging”.

“The numbers of people sleeping rough remain extremely high,” said Henderson. “Years of stagnant funding and real-term cuts have pushed vital homelessness services to breaking point. This is leaving many people without critical support and exposing them to the trauma of sleeping rough. It is essential that the government supports the mayor’s plan, protecting services by ensuring they have the necessary funding to keep their doors open, providing a lifeline for vulnerable people.”

But the number of people sleeping rough in London reached record highs in 2025. Annual Chain figurers counted 13,231 people homeless on the streets between April 2024 and March 2025 – higher than at any point on record. While numbers fell across London between January and March this year, some boroughs recorded rises, including Bromley, Croydon, Greenwich and Hackney. Hackney saw the largest increase, with a 56% rise in the number of people rough sleeping compared to the same time last year, Crisis analysis found.

Crisis chief executive Matt Downie said: “We are very pleased to see the fall in rough sleeping figures in London, and now need to build on this success by tackling pressures in temporary accommodation. The single biggest intervention the Westminster government could do right now to prevent rising homelessness across the board is to unfreeze housing benefit. This will make private rent homes more affordable for people on lower incomes and offer hope for those deeply worried about keeping a roof over their heads.”

Today’s falling numbers are a boost to Sadiq Khan’s ambitions to address rough sleeping in the English capital. But London remains England’s homelessness hotspot. Separate government homelessness statistics, released on the same day, showed 75,600 households were living in temporary accommodation in the English capital as of the end of 2025.

That’s 56% of the 134,210 households living in temporary accommodation across the whole of England.

Jo Carter, CEO of Glass Door Homeless Charity, which operates homeless shelters in London, said the Renters’ Rights Act’s ban on no-fault evictions won’t be enough to reduce street homelessness on its own. The long-awaited legislation comes into force tomorrow (1 May) and the Labour government hopes it will prevent homelessness. “The latest figures on rough sleeping in London highlight the worrying situation we find ourselves in ahead of the first provisions of the Renters’ Rights Act coming into effect”, said Carter. “From tomorrow, the end of section 21 evictions will give renters greater security – a change which took years of campaigning and is worth celebrating. Unfortunately, on its own this will not be enough to stop homelessness from increasing.” Carter said Glass Door’s emergency winter night shelters received more than 1,300 applications for spaces over the winter but were forced to close registrations due to the high level of demand. She added: “Action from the government to prevent people from needing services like ours could not be more urgent. The Renters’ Rights Act represents a positive step forward, but needs to be followed up with a serious plan for tackling housing affordability and dramatically expanding the supply of social housing. If this happens, we can start to make statistics like today’s a thing of the past.”

One In Three Scots Fear Losing Their Home In Coming Years

MORE than one in three Scots are worried they could lose their home within the next few years, according to new polling that highlights mounting anxiety over Scotland’s housing and homelessness emergency, reports deadlinenews.

The research found 35% of people across Scotland are concerned about losing their home because of pressures including the cost of living, a lack of affordable housing, high rents and rising mortgage costs. Concern is highest among 18 to 24-year-olds, where almost half (49%) share that fear. Concern about housing insecurity remains elevated well beyond the youngest age groups, with 45% of 25 to 34-year-olds worried about losing their home in the coming years, followed by 42% of 35 to 54-year-olds.

The issue is also being felt across Scotland’s cities and regions, with concern highest in Glasgow at 41%, followed by Inverness at 37%. In Aberdeen and Dundee 32% of Scots are worried about losing their home in the next few years and 31% of people in Edinburgh. The findings came in polling commissioned for the Everyone Home collective, an expert group of more than 40 expert organisations focused on housing and homelessness in Scotland.

Homeless Network Scotland, who convene the collective, said the findings show housing justice must be a central concern for the new administration, with growing public sentiment reflecting the scale of the country’s housing emergency. Margaret-Ann Brünjes, chief executive at Homeless Network Scotland, said: “These figures confirm that housing insecurity is no longer a fringe issue, it is a weight on the minds of people across Scotland. Younger generations, in particular, feel increasingly locked out of the stability they need to build their lives. Voters are sending an unmistakable message: homelessness and housing must be treated as urgent national priorities. While these issues are appearing in party manifestos, the level of ambition shown so far falls short of the radical action this emergency demands.”

Around 250,000 people are currently on housing waiting lists across Scotland, while more than 17,000 households, including around 10,000 children, are living in temporary accommodation according to Everyone Home, a coalition that unites third and academic sector expertise with lived experience knowledge of the issue. Everyone Home’s Housing Justice manifesto called for a significant increase in social and affordable house-building to reverse those trends. Research commissioned by The Scottish Federation of Housing Associations, Shelter Scotland and the Chartered Institute for Housing found Scotland must deliver 15,693 new social and affordable homes every year to reduce homelessness. The collective warned that failure to act is costing the public heavily, with some local authorities now unable to meet their statutory duties, and forced to spend hundreds of millions of pounds on unsafe and unsuitable temporary accommodation – with a knock-on impact on wider council spending.

Brünjes said: “Homelessness is the harshest consequence of Scotland’s housing emergency. Our broken system is failing far too many people and causing untold harm. Housing justice means fixing that system so everyone has access to a safe, secure and affordable home. The human and financial cost of inaction is rising every year, and it is taxpayers who are footing the bill for a system that is being forced to rely on temporary fixes instead of long-term solutions. We are spending public money managing crisis rather than preventing it. That is why Scotland needs not only more homes, but better joined-up support across housing, health, justice and social care to stop people falling through the cracks.”

The collective is also calling for full and effective implementation of new homelessness prevention measures and proper resourcing for frontline public services to identify housing risks earlier and allow intervention before crisis point. The expert coalition said prevention must become a central pillar of housing policy if Scotland is to reduce pressure on councils, the NHS and wider public services. Brünjes added: “We know what works. Prevention, early intervention and joined-up services can stop homelessness before it starts – but only if they are properly funded and delivered. This election is a major opportunity for all parties to show they understand the scale of the housing emergency and are prepared to meet it with the ambition required.”

The polling comes as housing and homelessness campaigners urge political parties to commit to stronger action ahead of the 2026 Scottish Parliament election, with calls for housing justice to sit at the heart of the next parliamentary term.

The Number Of Homeless Children In England Could Fill Wembley Stadium Twice

The latest official homelessness statistics show 176,000 children in England are now living in temporary accommodation. It’s the latest record-high figure and means there are as many homeless kids as the population of Oxford, reports the Big Issue.

The number of children who are now homeless and living in temporary accommodation in England is at the highest level since records began as the country’s spiralling housing crisis has left more people than ever without a home. New statutory homelessness statistics for October to December 2025 found 176,130 dependent children were living in temporary accommodation. That’s almost equivalent to filling Wembley Stadium two times over and more than the population of Oxford or York. Households with children living in temporary accommodation is up by 0.1% since July to September 2025 and 5.9% since 31 December 2024. Almost two-thirds of the 134,210 households in temporary accommodation in England now include dependent children.

The total number of households in temporary accommodation for October to December 2025 has dropped slightly below the record levels seen in the last quarter, but still remains higher than the same time the previous year. Government statisticians explained that “while this shift is small, this is the first quarter that the number of households in temporary accommodation has fallen since 2022.” Responding to the statistics, homelessness minister Alison McGovern said: “While today’s figures show progress being made, with fewer families becoming homeless and a sharp reduction in children in B&B accommodation, there is still much to do to break the heart-breaking cycle of homelessness and bring down the unacceptable number of children in temporary accommodation. We are taking action with a homelessness strategy focused on tackling homelessness for good – backed by a record £3.6 billion to eliminate unlawful use of B&Bs for families, improve the quality of temporary accommodation and cut long term rough sleeping, so that everyone gets the secure home that they deserve.”

Youth homelessness charity Centrepoint explained that too many young people are “trapped in limbo” while living in temporary accommodation. “The increasing reliance on temporary accommodation cannot continue,” Dr Lisa Doyle, head of policy and public affairs at Centrepoint, told the Big Issue. “It is meant to be a short-term solution, however, the young households who are forced to live in it for years face the risk of repeated homelessness, poor mental health, and long-term disadvantage increases. Unfortunately, there is no silver bullet here. The government is doing the right thing by making commitments to reducing the use of temporary accommodation as well as its focus on prevention and support – but it’s increasing the level of house building, including the building of suitable one bedroom social homes, that will transform things for young people,” Doyle added. “Without that, too many young people will continue facing homelessness and excluded from stable housing and the opportunity to move forward with their lives.”

It’s a crisis that is hitting London particularly hard. There are 21 households living in temporary accommodation per 1,000 households in London, compared with 2.8 households per 1,000 in the rest of England. Housing costs in London are significantly higher than the rest of the UK and continue to rise. In the private rented sector, the average rent now accounts more than for 40% of household income. As a result, child poverty rate in London almost double once housing costs are taken into account, rising from 16% before housing costs to 31% after, a much larger increase than in any other region.

Alex Firth, advocacy officer at charity Just Fair, told the Big Issue: “These figures show a clear failure to protect children’s rights. Every child has the right to a safe, secure home, but across the UK that right is being denied on a huge scale. Housing is not a privilege, it is a human right recognised in international law. When that right is not protected, it affects everything: children’s health, education, stability and sense of security.” Firth added: “Local authorities are on the frontline, but they need the powers, funding and national leadership to act. These elections are a moment for accountability. People should be asking: will those seeking election commit to making the right to housing real in our communities? After years of rising homelessness, we need more than short-term fixes. We need a rights-based approach that guarantees everyone a safe and secure place to live.”

Rick Henderson, CEO at Homeless Link, called for leaders to “prioritise prevention and break the cycle of homelessness” to turn things around. Henderson added that the national Plan to End Homelessness must be put into action, “with local authorities rising to the challenge using the new responsibilities and opportunities given to them. It is also critical that all government departments are made to take responsibility for ensuring their policies do not unintentionally push people into homelessness,” he said. “The social security system and proposed Home Office immigration policies are of particular concern and must be addressed urgently if we are to end homelessness for good.”

The official homelessness statistics did, however, show a fall in the number of households approaching councils for support with homelessness. A total of 84,250 households had an initial homelessness assessment from a local authority over the three-month period, down 1.3% on October to December 2024. From these initial assessments, 76,270 were assessed as owed a duty to prevent or relieve homelessness. There were also 33,630 households assessed as at risk of falling into homelessness, down 3.1% from the same quarter last year. But the continued homelessness crisis is having a big impact on families in particular. The latest figures found that the most common length of time for households with children to have spent in temporary accommodation is two to five years. That’s 21,260 households and a quarter of families in temporary accommodation. Of these, 35.9% were in nightly paid accommodation. Experts have explained that council spending on temporary accommodation is continuing to soar, with the cost of placing households in temporary accommodation reaching £2.8 billion in 2024 – but this is a “sticking plaster” solution to the homelessness crisis.

John Bird, Big Issue founder and crossbench peer, said: “The government’s investment in homelessness is beginning to turn the tide. While it’s good to see numbers starting to fall, we must be wary of becoming over-reliant on the sticking plaster solution of temporary accommodation. More than 85,000 families across the UK are trapped in this limbo, with instability shaping thousands of young lives and limiting their long-term opportunities. Our councils are spending up to 60% of their so-called homelessness prevention grants on temporary accommodation. I fear ‘homelessness prevention’ is becoming a buzzword, a false promise by politicians with no new ideas. We need to invest resources in encouraging radical, innovative, challenging ideas that change the landscape of homelessness, like the Big Issue did 35 years ago.”