Why Are Homes Left Empty In The UK And How Can We Fill Them Up?

Empty homes are ‘a sign of what is wrong with the housing crisis’, campaigners say. Here’s how many homes are being left empty in the UK, reports the Big Issue.

The UK has been gripped by a housing crisis for decades and empty homes mean that properties are lying vacant while record numbers of people are experiencing homelessness. Campaign group Action on Empty Homes recently revealed that more than one million homes are being left empty in England. The group’s analysis of government council tax data found 754,264 empty homes – with more than 300,000 empty over the long-term, and 268,153 second homes in the council taxbase. The number of homes left empty has been on the rise, the campaigners said. England’s empties are 13% higher than during the Covid pandemic and up 14% year on year. Meanwhile, London has seen numbers rise by almost a quarter in the last year and up 138% in the last decade.

“We are told that we can build our way out of a housing and homelessness crisis but it seems that our housing market is flooded with empty homes,” said Chris Bailey, director of policy and campaigns at Action on Empty Homes. The group released the figures to mark National Empty Homes Week in March. “We believe we are building the wrong housing to solve this crisis. But with the right incentives and support surely some of these empties could be used to make a difference? “Action on Empty Homes see empty homes both as a sign of what is wrong and as an opportunity to start turning our housing crisis around.”

Big Issue recently backed calls for a government empty homes strategy in England, with John Bird calling it “bold, long-term prevention thinking”. The number of vacant homes in England has risen by 50% in the decade since the last the last government-funded programme ended, Bailey said. He called for capital gains tax relief to allow empty homes to be sold into social housing stock. “At present we spend billions subsidising temporary accommodation trapping families in substandard accommodation while bankrupting councils when we could be investing in creating lifetime social homes by retrofitting and repairing wasted empty homes, while we await more significant investment in new social homes – which should be our highest priority,” said Bailey. “In 2026, our focus is on the opportunity which empty homes represent, to offer hope for the future. But that hope will be in vain while government continue to tie the council’s hands with weak powers and a focus on building homes that we won’t see for years, without getting the homes we already have occupied and upgraded.”

How many empty homes are there in Wales?

More than 22,000 homes are empty for more than six months in Wales at a time when one in every 14 households in Wales is currently waiting for a social home. The Bevan Foundation has suggested a shortage of social housing in the country could be solved by using existing homes and buildings. In Wales, there are currently 6,285 people living in temporary accommodation while they wait to be housed, including 2,500 children. To help tackle this, the Welsh government has been working towards the delivery of 20,000 new social homes during the current Senedd term. But with housebuilding levels slumping, attentions should turn to existing properties instead, the think tank said.

There were 22,528 homes in Wales empty for six months or more in 2025-26 and up to 4,500 could be suitable for purchase as social homes, according to Bevan Foundation analysis. A further 60,000 homes sold off under the Right to Buy scheme, which was abolished in Wales in 2019, could be purchased by social landlords. There are also opportunities to buy homes from second homeowners as well as holiday lets and private landlords looking to sell following greater regulations.

Wendy Dearden, senior policy and research officer at the Bevan Foundation, said: “It cannot be right that, tonight, thousands of families across Wales will go to bed in cramped, unsuitable rooms in B&Bs while perfectly good houses sit empty across the country. As homelessness and waiting lists for housing continue to grow, it’s clear that Wales’s housing crisis can’t be fixed by building alone. We need to look at how we can use the stock we already have – whether that’s by refurbishing empty homes and buildings or purchasing ex-council houses and privately-rented homes – to provide social homes at the scale that’s needed.” Dearden added that regulations would need to change to scale up efforts and more funding would be needed. Changes included amending land transaction tax to exempt social landlords and community groups repurposing homes and the Welsh working with the Westminster to review VAT rules. “In our research, we found great examples of local practice, and a real enthusiasm to bring existing properties into use,” she said.

How many empty homes are there in Scotland?

In Scotland, 44,453 privately owned homes have sat empty for more than six months as of September 2025. Of those, 32,337 have lay vacant for over 12 months. That was an increase of 915 homes over the previous year, according to figures published by the Scottish government. The Scottish Empty Homes Partnership (SEHP) has called for continued investment and strategic working to realise the potential of the thousands of properties lying empty across the country.

The group, which formed in 2010, has brought 13,000 homes back into use. But, like in Wales and England, house-building levels remain low. The Scottish government has previously declared a housing emergency and pledged to build 110,000 affordable homes by 2032. Five years into the programme, 32,479 homes have been built. With 36,000 more by 2030 promised in the most recent comprehensive spending review, Shelter Scotland estimated 41,521 would have be built in the last two years to hit the milestone. That’s where turning to vacant properties could help.

Tahmina Nizam, Scottish Empty Homes Partnership national manager, said“In councils across the country, dedicated empty homes officers are working hard to bring empty homes back into use. The figures are a reminder of just how important that work is. No home was built to sit empty, and we simply can’t afford to let these vital assets go to waste. Bringing empty properties back into use is a cost-effective way to ease housing pressures; in many cases it will be the simplest, quickest, way to expand local affordable and social housing stock.”

What are the solutions to empty homes?

Bringing homes left empty back into use is often the responsibility of local authorities. Councils in England can charge higher rates of council tax for properties left unfurnished and unoccupied to encourage owners to bring them back into use. That means council tax can double after a home is left empty for one year, rising to 200% for a home unoccupied for five years and 300% for more than a decade. The Welsh government’s national empty homes grant scheme offers homeowners up to £25,000 to renovate properties, making them energy efficient and suitable to live in. There is a £2 million loan fund in Scotland for acquiring and refurbishing empty homes.

But Propertymark research, which quizzed 226 councils in England, Scotland and Wales through freedom of information requests, found that only 38% of councils have an empty homes strategy in place and just 41% have at least one dedicated empty homes officer. Timothy Douglas, head of policy and campaigns at property agents body Propertymark, said: “Long-term empty properties are a visible reminder of a system that is not working as effectively as it should. At a time when housing demand continues to outstrip supply, leaving hundreds of thousands of homes unused is neither economically nor socially sustainable. Our research shows that while governments across the UK have introduced a range of measures, too many local authorities lack the dedicated resources, funding and strategic framework needed to deliver meaningful change. Financial penalties alone will not solve the problem. What works is sustained local engagement, professional advice, and properly funded empty homes teams that can support owners through the process of bringing properties back into use.”

The Renters’ Rights Act Information Sheet 2026

From 1 May 2026, the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 will give tenants new rights and introduce new rules for private landlords. This information sheet explains how the new rules may affect your current tenancy. These changes only affect you if you are a tenant in the private rented sector with an assured or assured shorthold tenancy. If you live in social housing or you are a lodger, the new rules will not usually apply to you. These rules have been introduced by law. Your landlord cannot put anything into a tenancy agreement to change or disapply them.

This document is only a summary of the changes. The new rules may change or impact your tenancy in a way not described below. The new rules apply to your tenancy automatically, even if your landlord does not update your tenancy agreement. If you do not have a written tenancy agreement or any written record of the tenancy’s terms, then your landlord must provide you with certain written information on or before 31 May 2026.

If your landlord serves you a notice seeking possession before 1 May 2026 The changes explained in this document may not apply to your tenancy on 1 May 2026 if your landlord serves a notice seeking possession under section 8 or section 21 of the Housing Act 1988 before 1 May 2026. If this happens, your landlord may still be able to take you to court to end your tenancy under the previous rules. You should seek advice if this happens to you.

Changes to fixed terms

You might have a fixed term tenancy. For example, your tenancy agreement may say the tenancy would last for 12 months. After 1 May 2026, it will not be possible for assured tenancy agreements to have a fixed term or a set end date. All tenancies will automatically become rolling tenancies from 1 May 2026 (sometimes known as ‘periodic tenancies’). Your tenancy will continue on a rolling basis. This will usually be monthly, unless your tenancy agreement sets out a shorter period, for example weekly or fortnightly. If your tenancy had an end date, it will no longer apply. Your tenancy will continue until:

  • you and your landlord decide together to end the tenancy
  • you end your tenancy by giving notice
  • your landlord ends it, if they have a valid legal reason

Your tenancy agreement might call your tenancy an ‘Assured Shorthold Tenancy’. This is the name of the private rented tenancy system until 1 May 2026. Assured Shorthold Tenancies will be abolished on 1 May 2026. Any tenancy previously called an Assured Shorthold Tenancy will automatically become an Assured Periodic Tenancy instead. Your tenancy will not end because of this change.

Increasing the rent

Your tenancy agreement may contain rent review clauses. These are terms in the agreement that allow the landlord to increase the rent. Rent review clauses cannot be used for new rent increases after 1 May 2026. If you have a rent review clause in your current tenancy agreement, it will not apply after this date. Landlords must instead use the process in section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 for increasing the rent. This means they can only increase the rent once per year. They will need to give you written notice of the proposed rent increase at least 2 months before that increase would take effect, using a form called Form 4A. Any rent increase must be no higher than the open market rent. If you think the proposed increase is above market rate, you can challenge it at the First-tier Tribunal.

If your landlord wants to end your tenancy

Your tenancy agreement may say that your landlord can evict you without a reason. This was known as a section 21 eviction. Your landlord cannot give you a section 21 notice on or after 1 May 2026, even if your tenancy agreement says they can. Instead, your landlord will need a legal reason to evict you. These reasons are called grounds for possession. Below is a brief summary of some of the main reasons your landlord may legally seek to evict you. You can find full details of these and other grounds on GOV.UK.

  • If you have not paid your rent on time
  • If you, others living with you, or visitors commit antisocial behaviour in or near the property
  • If you, or others living with you, do not care for the property properly
  • If your tenancy was for certain purposes, for example it was connected to your employment, or was for temporary or supported accommodation

You cannot be required to leave under some grounds for the first 12 months of a tenancy. These are:

  • if your landlord intends to sell the property
  • if your landlord or their family member wants to move into the property

Your landlord will need to give you a section 8 notice of seeking possession, using 1 or more of the grounds for possession.

A section 8 notice must state the date by which your landlord is asking you to leave. They must give you the required amount of time under each ground. If you have not left by the end of the notice period, your landlord will need to apply to court to get the property back. This is called applying for a possession order. At court, the landlord must provide evidence that they have a valid reason to evict you. You will have the opportunity to explain why you think your landlord does not have a legal reason to evict you, or why eviction is not reasonable under certain grounds. You can access free legal advice through the Housing Loss Prevention Advice Service1 before going to court and on the day of the court hearing.

If you want to end the tenancy

You will be able to end the tenancy at any point by giving your landlord notice. This must be done:

  • so the tenancy ends on a day when the rent is due or the day before the rent is due
  • in writing, for example, by letter or email

You will need to give your landlord at least 2 months’ notice. You can agree a shorter notice period with the landlord in writing, as long as any other tenants named on the tenancy agreement also agree.

Keeping a pet

From 1 May 2026, you have the right to request to keep a pet. Your landlord cannot unreasonably refuse your request. If they refuse, they must inform you in writing, and should tell you the reason why. They will need to consider each request on a case-by-case basis. You can challenge the landlord’s decision in court.

If you are a student who rents from a private landlord

If you are a full-time student, your landlord may be able to evict you using possession ground 4A. They will be able to do this at the end of the academic year and must give you 4 months’ notice ending between 1 June and 30 September. Your landlord can only use this ground if they have previously given you written notice that they may use it. They must give this to you by 31 May 2026, in most cases.  This information sheet does not count as that written notice. If your landlord wants to evict you at the end of the 2025/26 academic year, they can serve you a notice seeking possession between 1 May and 30 July 2026 (inclusive). They will need to give this to you with at least 2 months’ notice.

For detailed guidance, forms and links to free advice services, visit the private renting guidance pages on GOV.UK.

New Homeless Village Offers ‘Brilliant Solution’ That Organisers Want To Bring To A Town Near You

Social Bite has opened its second homeless village in Scotland and the charity believes it could be a blueprint to helping councils address rising homelessness, reports the Big Issue.

Residents have moved into a new homeless village that organisers believe could offer councils an affordable way to address rising homelessness.

Social Bite’s new £3 million Harriet Gardens village of sustainable modular homes opens its doors on Thursday (9 April) at the former Westfield Saw Mills site in Rutherglen, South Lanarkshire, following a three-year wait. It’s the second village the Scottish social enterprise has opened following a settlement in Granton, near Edinburgh, back in 2018. The new supported living community arrives at a time when homelessness has increased across Scotland with local authorities and the Scottish government declaring housing emergencies in recent times.

Social Bite co-founder Josh Littlejohn told Big Issue that the new village demonstrates what could be a “brilliant solution” to a homelessness crisis that has seen a record-high 18,092 households trapped in temporary accommodation across Scotland. “We feel we’ve got a fantastic homelessness accommodation model here now that would work in towns and cities all over the country basically,” Littlejohn told Big Issue. “We’re excited to start having those conversations and trying to work proactively with local councils to help bring this to other places. If you think about all of the councils declaring housing emergencies all over Britain, this is just a brilliant, brilliant solution to that. It’s not going to solve the whole thing but it’s going to make a massive difference to the people that are here.”

The first Social Bite village has helped more than 100 people experiencing homelessness to live independently in shared modular homes. The new village opened its doors on Thursday (9 April) two years after it was granted approval. Operated by South Lanarkshire Council with support provided by The Salvation Army, people who are currently homeless will live in 15 single-unit homes. The modular Nest Houses, manufactured by Ecosystems Technologies, have been improved following “eight years of feedback”, Littlejohn said. Residents also have access to an outdoor gym and a central community hub with shared spaces for cooking, group activities, therapeutic support and social connection. They are expected to spend between six and 12 months in the village with intensive wraparound support before moving on to the mainstream housing market.

The council’s homelessness lead toured Social Bite’s original Edinburgh village, according to Littlejohn, and decided to decommission the Lindsay House hostel in East Kilbride, which closed last year. “They felt it was outdated and not really fit for purpose and they were just getting really poor outcomes from it,” said Littlejohn. “I think they thought that the village could be a state of the art, purpose-built, alternative supported accommodation facility. It’s been quite a long process, but a rewarding one to see it come to fruition.” Littlejohn said the construction offers a more affordable alternative to temporary accommodation at around £82,000 per housing unit without compromising on quality. He added: “We were getting great outcomes where we saw people were really thriving and the people that were staying there were saying: ‘Wow, this is so much better than B&B’s or hostels or obviously rough sleeping.’ It was proving a really superior alternative so we felt the model had a lot of legs for other towns or cities to take it on.”

A total of 2,467 people declared as homeless in South Lanarkshire between 2024-25. Sharon Egan, South Lanarkshire Council’s head of housing services, said the project offered the chance for the local authority to change how it addresses homelessness. “This development began with an ambition, supported by our elected members and senior leadership team, to explore new and innovative approaches to homelessness, particularly for people with complex needs.” said Egan. “From the outset, Social Bite were a key partner in helping us turn that ambition into a reality, and I want to recognise the commitment, creativity and persistence they have shown throughout the journey and in particular thank Social Bite for the significant investment toward responding to and resolving homelessness in South Lanarkshire. We are very proud of what has been achieved with this project and look forward to seeing the impact it will have for many years to come.”

As for Social Bite, the ambition doesn’t stop at South Lanarkshire. The social enterprise, which has counted Leonardo Di Caprio and George Clooney among its celebrity supporters in the past, is hoping other councils will come forward to adopt the homeless village model. Social Bite has offered to make a financial contribution to cover construction and subsidise costs to local authorities. “We’d had the original village project in Edinburgh since 2018 and we’ve been kind of doing our own thing there and it’s been really successful,” said Littlejohn. “But other local authorities or local and national governments haven’t taken a great deal of interest in it over the last eight years. Now it seems like there’s quite significant interest from lots of local authorities. South Lanarkshire was the first one that took a bit of interest. We’re keen to really try and push the accelerator now.”

‘People Are So Judgmental’: The Growing Cohort Of Over-55s Facing Homelessness

Richard Hewett, who was forced to sleep in his car when his relationship broke down, is one of many in the UK hit by rising costs and a lack of social housing, reports the Guardian.

When Richard Hewett’s relationship broke down, he was forced to leave his partner’s council house – but found his disability benefits didn’t stretch far enough to get him his own flat in his Essex home town. He resorted to the next best option: sleeping in his car. It wasn’t what he had expected, aged 59. At 6ft 2in, he squeezed into a Ford Focus and struggled to sleep. When he broke his ankle, he couldn’t look after it properly, contracted sepsis and had his leg amputated. But what stings the most is the feeling of shame. He was no longer able to take care of his appearance, which he had always taken pride in. He went to the toilet in a park daily, where passersby would ask: ‘Can’t you go somewhere else?’ “It was horrendous,” he said. “People are so terribly judgmental … It really had quite an effect on my mental health.”

Hewett is one of a rapidly rising number of people in older age groups facing homelessness as housing benefit levels fall behind rents, with recent figures from the Office for National Statistics showing that 15,690 households headed by over-65s are at risk of homelessness, a rise of 79% in the last five years. Hewett thinks “life is getting harder” for older people, especially those who are dependent on state support and who didn’t benefit from buying council homes but are instead now suffering from the dearth those sell-offs left behind. “Life has become so much more costly,” he said, adding that austerity and benefits freezes hadn’t helped. “They were bad enough before then,” he said.

Sarah Elliott, the chief executive of Shelter, said that as the population aged and rents soared, the charity was increasingly hearing from older people “who have been wrenched from the tight-knit communities they have lived in for decades and shunted into dismal temporary accommodation”. “Pensioners should be enjoying their hard-earned retirement, not facing the threat of homelessness,” she said. “To make sure people have dignity and stability in their old age, we must limit in-tenancy rent hikes and, ultimately, build a new generation of social rent homes.”

Several homelessness charities told the Guardian that rising numbers of people aged over 55 were seeking their help. Chain (Combined Homelessness and Information Network), which records information on rough sleeping, reported an increase in people in this age bracket sleeping rough in London from 450 at the beginning of 2024 to 713 at the end of 2025. Alexander Brown, the director of Soup Kitchen London, has seen “a clear increase” in the number of over-65s over the last two years, with this group now about 20% of the 200 people the charity helps each morning. They cite the rising cost of food and utilities, along with poor physical health and isolation, as factors.

The Greater Change charity, which has supported Hewett with a grant, said that over the last four years the median age among the people it supports had increased by more than eight years. Its chief executive, Jonathan Tan, first observed this in 2024 when the proportion of over-55s it helped doubled to 12%, from 6% in 2023. It has remained above 10% since. He said older clients were rarely pushed into homelessness by a single event. Instead, “loss, ill health, financial pressure and systemic gaps” pushed people into crisis, compounded by rising living costs, the loss of employment later in life and limited opportunities to re-enter the workforce, he said. Navigating benefits and pensions through complex online systems could be overwhelming for many older people, he added, with support often arriving too late when they were already in crisis. “We do think it will get worse … temporary accommodation is already under severe pressure and there is very little flexibility in the system,” he said.

Jess Harris, who researches homelessness at King’s College London, said there were two main cohorts of older homeless people: those at “the sharp end of need” who have experienced multiple adverse events – often addiction, mental illness and childhood trauma – who have lived on and off the streets for decades, and those more recently pushed into temporary homelessness. The problem is compounded by an under-researched “social care gap”, which perpetuates homelessness by failing to prevent and manage complex health problems, with older people living in hostels receiving health and social care “in establishments that really weren’t designed for these populations”, she said.

Morgan Vine, the director of policy at Independent Age, said the rise in older homelessness was “linked to the growing number of older people who find themselves living in the private rented sector”, with one-third of older private renters in poverty after housing costs. Although average UK rent has risen by 10.5% since April 2024, housing benefit has been frozen since 2024, which she urged the government to address. This was the experience for Sarah*, in her mid-60s. She ended up sofa surfing with friends and family after a relationship breakdown, and – like Hewett – learned that her benefits would not cover monthly rent or a deposit. She found herself in a double bind when her benefits were stopped due to the lack of a fixed address. “I wouldn’t recommend it to anybody, because you’d be sleeping on sofas and things like that. You’ve got to keep on moving around every three nights,” she said. “I think it’s difficult for older people now, especially if they don’t have friends and family to help them. They can’t afford much with prices going up … The government should help older people more to find a place to stay.”

A Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government spokesperson said: “No one deserves to experience homelessness. That is why we are taking action to prevent homelessness and investing £3.6bn in homelessness and rough sleeping services. We’re also tackling the root cause of homelessness by building 1.5m new homes and investing £39bn in social and affordable housing. Our Renters’ Rights Act will also empower private tenants to challenge excessive rent hikes and give tenants the added security that they deserve.”

Former Homeless Man Opens Pizzeria Thanks To Foodbank Chef

A man who was once homeless is now running a successful pizzeria thanks to a chef at a soup kitchen who taught him the art of making pizza, reports the BBC.

Mark Clarey, of Blackpool, said his life had “spiralled” and “he lost everything” in 2019, including his home and his events company, after the deaths of his mother, his step-father and his auntie within months of each other. But despite losing his home and staying in a friend’s shed, Clarey wanted to help when he heard about a charity asking for clothes donations for homeless people. Clarey spent time collecting clothes for Amazing Graze and his “good deed came back tenfold” when the founder offered to put him up in a hotel, something he described as a “turning point” that eventually led to him setting up Bedrock Pizza.

The 62-year-old said after his auntie and mum had died, his step-father’s death was “the straw that broke the camel’s back”. He said he had “lost the plot” and took his eyes off his events business. It led to Clarey losing his home, though he still had a van. In November 2018, he used it to collect clothes and bedding for Amazing Graze, a community cafe that supports homeless people. When he handed the donations over to its founder Mark Butcher in a car park in Blackpool, the chance meeting was what Clarey described as a “massive turning point”.

Butcher, who was then a trustee at the charity and is still a volunteer, was impressed that Clarey was helping others when he was also homeless. He offered to pay for a hotel out of his own pocket to keep Clarey off the streets.

“I was very, very fortunate,” Clarey said. It was the start of a great friendship and Clarey said Butcher had given him mental stability and moral support that enabled him to bounce back. It also happened to be at a time when Amazing Graze was forced to find new premises and moved to Bolton Street in South Shore, Blackpool.

Clarey, who was an electrician and plumber and could tile, volunteered to help do it up, as a thank you for Butcher paying for his accommodation. “It was a wreck,” he said. “It didn’t even have modern plug sockets.” Clarey said they had started building a temporary kitchen along with other volunteers on a Monday and the soup kitchen was serving food by the Friday. “It gave me something to occupy my mind and gave me meaning and purpose,” he said.

In 2020, he helped transform part of the premises into Pizza Grazia restaurant to boost Amazing Graze funds. This resulted in one of the group’s volunteers, who was a trained chef, teaching Clarey how to make pizzas and it eventually inspired him to set up a business making wood fired pizzas from a van. “I had seen an old retro caravan at a festival in 2015. The hatch opened and there was a pizza oven inside,” he said. “I thought then it was a great idea for business.” Clarey refurbished a van and launched Bedrock Pizza in September 2020.

As well as running the business, he has continued to volunteer at Amazing Graze and he is currently helping to transform the first-floor building into a church and community centre. “I needed a hand up – not a hand out – and that is what Mark gave me,” he said. Butcher, 56, said Clarey “was one of the charity’s biggest success stories” and a “shining example” of people who had been helped by Amazing Graze. He said they had helped each other since the lucky stroke of serendipity in a car park in Blackpool and they were “like brothers” now.

They had a lot in common, including both losing their mothers. “We related in our grief for our mums,” he said. Clarey is leading the team of volunteers currently turning the first-floor of Amazing Graze’s building into a church and community centre. “He is very gifted… he was also a top DJ… and can fix and do anything,” Butcher said. He added he was “very proud” of what Clarey had done.

Half A Million Empty Homes Are ‘Hiding In Plain Sight’

A study by Habitat for Humanity found that empty council properties have soared in the last five years while empty privately owned, non-residential buildings could yield 500,000 homes, reports the Big Issue.

Empty council properties are up by a third in England in just five years, research has found, with a charity explaining that half a million homes across the country are “hiding in plain sight”. A study by Habitat for Humanity Great Britain (HfHGB) and London School of Economics found that, since 2021, empty council properties are up by 44% in Wales, 30% in England and 18% in Scotland. The increase is even larger in certain areas, with Sheffield seeing an almost 500% rise in empty buildings since 2021.

The charity claimed that these empty properties have the potential to be converted to provide 25,000 new homes for those in need. That comes at a time when Labour has doubled-down on its promise to build 1.5 million new homes in order to address the housing crisis. At the same time, the latest government figures found 134,760 households in England are living in temporary accommodation, with 172,420 children recorded as living in temporary accommodation as of September 2025 – a record high. Habitat for Humanity Great Britain added, that beyond empty council properties, there are 175,000 privately owned, empty non-residential buildings in England, and claimed they have the potential to provide over 500,000 homes at a “fraction of the environmental cost of new builds”.

Henrietta Blackmore, national director of HfHGB, explained that councils across the UK are dealing with stretched budgets, but converting empty properties into homes could help alleviate the high costs of providing temporary accommodation to households facing homelessness. “The budgetary pressures local authorities face are not helped by constant fire-fighting with scarce resources,” said Blackmore. “Vulnerable people have better outcomes when they have access to safe, good quality accommodation. Providing that sort of housing now reduces the day-to-day costs that councils face tomorrow.” Blackmore added: “The fact we have empty buildings and a housing crisis isn’t new, but it’s time for all involved to grasp new ways of thinking and doing to boost the stock of social housing. That’s what our report sets out; practical steps that could be taken to address the overwhelming domestic challenge of our times.”

As well as uncovering the increase in empty properties across the UK, the HfHGB report recommended the creation of a government task force in order to tackle the issue, also proposing a requirement for local authorities to publish registers of empty commercial units and assess their suitability for conversion. They also recommended removing barriers to private and public investment in conversion projects. HfHGB explained that new build housing doesn’t incur VAT, while most conversions are charged a 20% VAT rate. The charity stated that this tax rate should be equalised, and that councils “should be able to access funding from existing schemes to support building regeneration”.

The report also stated that converting existing empty buildings into housing is “significantly better for the environment”, and that the government should update existing UK net-zero building standards to support the conversion of empty buildings. “Walk around any town centre and you’ll see empty buildings that are overlooked. Many of these could be reused as great homes, reducing the carbon impact of the building industry and supporting the government’s pledge to reduce housing costs for families,” said Blackmore. “We know that empty commercial buildings are often overlooked because they seem more complex than open spaces. Greater support and clarity from the government could see many more homes unlocked, in the places we need them most,”

Alex Greaves, global head of living at M&G plc, added that there is a “huge, untapped potential” in empty buildings in the UK. “By enabling local authorities to partner effectively with the private sector to bring empty commercial buildings back into use, the government can accelerate the delivery of high-quality homes, cut carbon emissions, and breathe new life into urban communities,” Greaves added.

Big Issue recently joined calls for action on empty homes. We were part of a coalition of 25 organisation urging the government to create an empty homes strategy. Big Issue founder Lord John Bird said a strategy “presents a smart opportunity to put much-needed homes back into a failing system”.

A ‘Dress Rehearsal’ For Life

Embassy Village offers 40 canal-side flats and support with budgeting, cooking and finding work, to help men start new lives and rediscover community, reports the Guardian.

It costs a lot to live by the canal in central Manchester, with even the pokiest of studios renting for £1,000. But in Embassy Village, the city’s newest waterside community, residents do not need to be rich. Quite the opposite, in fact. To live there, you have to be male, homeless and ready to get your life back on track. Nestled between the River Irwell and the Bridgewater canal, just across from the fashionable Castlefield district, Embassy’s 40 studio flats have been built under two Victorian viaducts carrying the city’s trams and trains. The land has been given for free on a 125-year lease by Peel Group, the developer behind MediaCity and the Trafford Centre. Peel owns the canal as well, which means residents can fish and kayak when they are not taking part in sessions on budgeting, cooking and getting ready for work. Embassy, the Christian charity behind the village, describes it as “dress rehearsal” for life back in bricks and mortar, cutting out the middle man of the shelter for homeless people.

Chris, a 57-year-old former painter and decorator from the north-east, became Embassy’s first resident after spending most of his life on the streets “travelling from town to town with a tent”. When the Guardian visited, he was particularly enthused about the angling opportunities, hoping to beat his record of a 29lb carp. He seemed overwhelmed to have his own front door for the first time in years, and a view of the canal. “I’m very lucky,” he said, as he marvelled at the pristine white walls of his new home, his private wet room and his small but high-spec German kitchen, kitted out with Bosch appliances. “We want residents to feel like: ‘Wow, I’ve landed on my feet – I’m going to take this opportunity,’” said Embassy’s indefatigable founder, Sid Williams, whose first foray into helping homeless people involved turning Mumford & Son’s tour bus into a mobile shelter.

Williams, a former youth worker, wants residents to feel important and valued. “In God’s upside down economy, the last, the poor, the least – in this world’s eyes – are his VIPs. That’s who Jesus wanted to spend his time with. “And we were like, wouldn’t it be great to take that literally? So that’s why we got a VIP tour bus that had been touring Tinie Tempah and Coldplay and had a deeply inappropriate champagne fridge on it.” As on the tour bus, drugs and alcohol are banned at Embassy, and no visitors are allowed. But it was a common misconception that most homeless people were addicts, said Williams, noting that about 60% of people were made homeless after a relationship breakdown.

More and more “average Joes” were ending up on the streets, he said. When he started working in the sector in 2004, many people were “institutionalised, coming out of the care system, the armed forces, prison and shelters … Whereas now, we find there’s about 300% to 400% on top, just your average Joes: people who just can’t quite make ends meet any more”. Those not in work are helped to apply for housing benefit – about £625 a month for a single man in Manchester, which covers Embassy’s rent and a few costs. “This is like a dress rehearsal at managing a home, managing your finances and holding a job down,” said Williams. “Granted, there’s a lot of hand-holding here. We have one full-time support worker to every six residents, which is basically unheard of.”

Preparing residents for life outside Embassy was crucial, said Tim Heatley, a co-founder of Manchester developer Capital & Centric, who was in charge of raising the money for Embassy Village as chair of the Greater Manchester’s Mayor’s Charity. “Helping them to clean, cook, budget, get a job, keep a job. If we don’t get that right, then it will have failed.” He wants residents to be comfortable, but not so much that they don’t want to leave: “I think we need to quickly move people from here on to their own accommodation – somewhere else that’s not state-supported – so that they can continue then to rebuild and go on and not be reliant on the state.”

In Manchester, where 1 in 61 people are homeless, the social housing waiting list is 15 years for able-bodied men. “No chance, basically,” said Williams. At Embassy’s other projects in Greater Manchester, residents stay for an average of 14 months before going into private rentals. “Between 92% and 95% of residents leave us with a full-time job, no long-run benefits, going to private rental. So we’re unburdening the council housing waiting list in the process.”

For Bev Craig, Manchester city council’s leader, Embassy Village is a cheering sign that “good people can do good things”. The council will refer homeless people to Embassy because she likes the emphasis on community-building. “When we talk to people that find themselves on the streets, it’s a failure of mental health services, it’s failure of tackling addiction, and it’s the failure of not being able to deal with loneliness,” she said. She hopes Embassy will “treat those individuals like they’re part of a community, help them develop, and teach them what it means to be in safe and sustainable accommodation”.

The village is designed to encourage as much social interaction as possible, such as at weekly “family dinners” cooked by staff. A sports pitch and boxing gym are under construction, as is a joinery studio run by Oli Green, who crafted some of the fanciest kitchens in Cheshire before pivoting to work with homeless people. The £6.2m build has been funded by the Moulding Foundation and the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, as well as an extraordinary 130-strong coalition of local businesses working either for nothing or for zero profit – many of whom are also offering jobs and training to residents. But Williams is permanently fundraising to cover the costs of six staff members. James Whittaker, Peel’s managing director, sees the Manchester Embassy Village as the first of many. “We’re not stopping here,” he said. “We can copy this in every city in every town throughout the UK.”

Homeless Young People ‘Left To Sleep Rough’

Councils failed to assess over a third of homeless young peoples’ needs, reports the Big Issue.

Councils in England are failing to provide assessments for over a third of young people facing homelessness, with many forced to sleep rough as a result, a youth homelessness charity has found. Centrepoint reported that of the 107,585 young people aged 16 to 24 who were facing homelessness in the last year, only 65% were assessed by their council for support, meaning more than a third (35%) did not receive the assessment they are entitled to. The research by Centrepoint also found that councils’ assessment rates are continuing to fall, despite the fact that the number of young people facing homelessness and looking for support from their council has increased.

“Too many young people find themselves denied assessments which they may need to access housing and homelessness support,” Lisa Doyle, Centrepoint’s head of policy and public affairs, said. “Regardless of the systemic reasons behind this – it can be unlawful, and the inevitable outcome is that young people are not getting the support they need.” She added that every week the Centrepoint helpline receives calls from young people who have been turned away from their local authority without an assessment, and that many of them “have been forced to sleep rough as a result”. Doyle also said a significant proportion of youngsters should be classed as in priority need and, therefore, entitled to support”.

The area with the worst rates of young people going without homelessness assessments in England was the South West, with research finding councils in this area were failing to assess over half of the young people presenting to them. The area with the highest increase in the number of people facing homelessness last year was the North West, with the area’s councils assessing less than half of the young people approaching them for support due to facing homelessness.

“Some of this is happening because councils simply lack the funds to follow up an assessment with support – but it’s clear there’s routine rationing of this support that goes beyond binary questions about funding,” said Doyle. “Councils should be doing better, and we urge the government to conduct a review to find out why so many young people are being turned away. The National Plan to End Homelessness, with its emphasis on prevention and the announcement of new funding, is a good start, as is the commitment to update the homelessness code of guidance.”

Centrepoint additionally looked at how much funding councils would have needed to assess and support homeless young people in 2024-25 and found that it would have cost £325 million. The research follows reports that many councils are on the verge of bankruptcy due to the costs of providing temporary accommodation, with figures finding the cost of housing households in temporary accommodation ballooned to £2.8 billion in 2024. Experts explained that providing households with temporary accommodation – 132,410 homeless households live in temporary homes – saw council spending soar and is a “sticking plaster” solution when it comes to the homelessness crisis. Doyle said: “We need to see some real urgency here: the more young people found ineligible for support, and the fewer cases resolved at earlier stages, the more young people reach the crisis point where intervention is more expensive – and personal cost becomes significant.”

In response to Centrepoint’s research, a Local Government Association spokesperson said: “Councils are committed to their duties to young people, and working with households with children to best support them, to best prevent homelessness and help those who are homeless out of it. “This remains hugely challenging, due to demand for temporary accommodation and a shortage of homes.” They added that councils need “the powers and resources to build or acquire genuinely affordable homes” to address the issue.

London’s Only Homeless Detox Clinic To Close

London’s only dedicated drug and alcohol detox unit for homeless people is to close St Thomas’ Hospital has confirmed, reports the BBC.

The Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) said the decision had been taken due to “rising costs”, adding that the service was “no longer affordable within existing funding”. The clinic, which is based at the hospital, ran with a £1m shortfall over the past year, and “there were also times when beds were underused”, the government added.

Co-founder of the Big Issue magazine and anti-poverty campaigner, Lord John Bird said he was “dismayed” at what he called a “short-sighted cost-cutting exercise”. The unit, which opened in 2021, worked to support people who sleep rough to “safely withdraw from alcohol and drugs as part of the first steps in a treatment journey”. The service also provided peer support, groups, and activities alongside a range of other initiatives focusing on stopping smoking, healthy eating, essential screening, vaccinations and mental wellbeing.

Lord Bird described the closure of the unit as “pulling the service out from beneath the people who desperately need it”. He added: “All we’re doing is pushing these problems back on to the streets. These patients will end up filling up A&Es, they’ll end up being more chaotic, they’ll end up in prisons.” The campaigner said the news of the closure “rubbished” the Mayor of London’s goal of ending rough sleeping in the capital by 2030.

The Mayor’s Office said that the Greater London Authority (GLA) “is not responsible for the unit and its funding”. A spokesperson for the Mayor said: “The mayor does not have powers to commission healthcare, but is committed to supporting vulnerable Londoners and recognises the importance of addiction treatment and detoxification services. That’s why City Hall has sought assurance from the capital’s health authorities that Londoners will continue to have access to detoxification services following this closure, and that any disruption will be kept to a minimum while a new service is developed.”

The BBC asked the DCHS and the City of London Corporation (which funds the service) about the possibility of a new service, as mentioned by City Hall, but neither would comment.

Home Office Pilot Saved 1,000 Refugee Families From Homelessness – Then Rules Changed

Refugees were given 56 days to find an income and a place to live under a Home Office pilot. Refugee Council warns reducing that time to 42 days risks more refugees ending up homeless, reports the Big Issue.

Giving refugees 56 days to find an income and a place to live after being evicted from Home Office accommodation prevented an estimated 1,000 refugee households from becoming homeless, Refugee Council has found. The Home Office ran a pilot scheme that extended the move-on period for newly recognised refugees to 56 days, offering them more breathing room to navigate the private rented sector and work with councils to avoid homelessness.  But the pilot scheme has now ended with the move-on period reduced to 42 days from 9 March this year.

Refugee Council warned that the reduced time for newly recognised refugees to find a new home could see homelessness increase beyond its current record-high levels. Imran Hussain, director of external affairs at Refugee Council, said: “Receiving refugee status in the UK should be a moment for people to celebrate and finally start rebuilding their lives in safety, after escaping war and persecution. Instead, they face a ticking clock, endless bureaucratic hurdles, and the threat of homelessness. Refugee homelessness has been driving increases in street homelessness in recent years.”

He added: “We can see what works – the Home Office’s 56-day pilot kept an estimated 1,000 households out of homelessness and eased pressure on overstretched councils. Even with 56 days, many people still struggle to secure housing because the system is complex and the barriers are high – cutting that time further will only push more people into crisis. Refugees want to stand on their own two feet – find work, pay their way and rebuild their lives. But they need a fair chance to do that. The government should learn from this progress and ensure proper support for new refugees to move on, with a system that works in practice, not just on paper.”

Refugee Council’s analysis of statutory homelessness figures showed 15,440 refugee households were supported by local councils in England between January and September 2025. The Homelessness Reduction Act requires councils to take reasonable steps to prevent homelessness for applicants who are at risk of homelessness within 56 days. A total of 10,170 of these were under the relief duty, meaning that councils were required to relieve homelessness. But Refugee Council said that the ratio of homelessness at the end of 2024 showed that an estimated 11,160 households would require support. Despite the extended period to find a home, many refugees still struggled to avoid homelessness.

The charity’s report found 43% of refugee households were able to secure housing during the nine-month pilot. A total of four in five refugees reported finding housing was “difficult” or “very difficult” with many of those who couldn’t find a home ending up staying in hostels, rough sleeping or sofa surfing instead. Awek, who was granted refugee status in 2022, said: “Along with refugee status came a letter telling me to leave the hotel accommodation. Now I was confused but had to leave. There was no proper guidance. I was handed a few contact numbers for support services, but most went unanswered. The silence felt loud. I became homeless for weeks. I slept rough outside and I rode buses with no destination – just to keep moving, just to stay warm. It was extremely cold outside. I would not wish that experience even to my worst enemy.”

The Home Office told Big Issue that the pilot was only intended to be a temporary experiment. The programme was launched in December 2024 and amended in September 2025 to exclude single adults unless they were pregnant, over 65 or had a disability. Home Office representatives added that key findings from the evaluation of the pilot and forecasted impacts on the asylum accommodation estate were considered before the decision was made to set the move-on period to 52 days.

“We have always been clear that this was a pilot programme,” said a Home Office spokesperson. “For individuals granted leave to remain, we are committed to successfully transitioning them from asylum accommodation, which is why we have extended the grace period to 42 days, from 28 days. Work is well underway to close every asylum hotel, with more suitable sites being brought forward to ease pressure on communities and cut asylum costs.”

Big Issue has previously reported on the impact on homelessness when the move-on period was cut to 28 days in 2023. We found that the number of homeless refugee households trebled from 450 to 1,500 following the Home Office decision.